1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

18-200VR or 70-300VR.. which?

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by Pesto126, Jul 24, 2008.

  1. Pesto126

    Pesto126

    566
    Apr 13, 2006
    Northeast USA
    I'm looking to possibly buy either the 18-200 or 70-300 for my D80.. basically as a carry around lens for family stuff. I currently own a variety of lenses: 17-55, 10-20, 70-200VR, 90mm, etc.

    Of course my 70-200 lens sort of covers the range.. and is sharp as can be.. but is rather heavy and not something you want to carry around. So, do I go with the 18-200 for the wide action.. or get the 70-300 for the longer end of things.

    Basically family photos, vacation shots and a lens my wife would use all the time when she borrows the camera. I currently keep the 17-55 on and use that as the general lens.

    I know the quality of either lens won't approach the 17-55 or 70-200 across the range.. but which one would be the best choice in terms of IQ, overall flexiblity and heaviness/carryability.? They both seem well respected at around f8 or so...

    Thx for the help!
     
  2. I love the ability to shoot wide, so I'd get the 18-200. Someone is selling in on www.ilovephotography.com for $499.

    Cindy
     
  3. rocketliv

    rocketliv Guest

    I think it depends on what you want to do the most. If you are planning to take more family type shots with backgrounds of where you are, I would go for the 18-200 but if you want more candid shots with a good distance go for the 70-300
     
  4. johnmh

    johnmh

    771
    Nov 21, 2007
    Greater NYC
    The 18-200 is more versatile. My wife uses it as her 'carry' lens and is very happy with it. The low end flexability easily beats the longer reach of the 70-300.

    The 70-300VR is a very nice longer zoom and has its place but doesn't work well on its own as a carry lens. It's simply not wide enough. We used this WITH a 24-120 for some time to cover an acceptable range.

    My current carry assortment is usually a Tokina 12-24, 24-85 2.8-4 (maybe a 24-70 upgrade?) and 70-200 VR with an assortment of TC's. Sometimes will throw in the 50 1.4 and 85 1.8. Works well but is more to carry.

    I've been known to go with the 35-70 2.8 and 70-300 if I want to cut down what I'm carrying.

    Also have a 200-400 for long work and just picked up a Sigma 150-500 for a more compact long zoom.
     
  5. andrzejmakal

    andrzejmakal

    571
    Apr 30, 2008
    Poland
    In your situation - 18-200, no question. In terms of IQ, 18-200 is not so bad as some claim, not too large prints- you won`t see any difference. Flexabilty of 18-200 -no comments:) 
    If you are affraid of IQ, take a look:

    http://www.pbase.com/andrzejmakal/18_200vr

    Click ORIGINAL at the bottom.

    Kind regards
    Andrzej
     
  6. adaml

    adaml

    976
    Feb 21, 2006
    chicago
    For your shooting subjects IMO you need the wide end more than the telephoto. Go with the 18-200, it may be the best all-around travel lens Nikon has ever made.
     
  7. Hotplate

    Hotplate

    300
    Oct 23, 2007
    Austin, TX
    I'd also suggest going for the 18-200 VR. You already have nicer glass for when you really need it. The convenience of of having one lens that covers the range the 18-200 does can really make up for any IQ issues, IMHO. I find it very convenient at times.
     
  8. Man up. You've already got the best with the 17-55 + 70-200VR combo. Carrying them will be good for your health. Actually, you'll get a better workout if you swap your d80 for a d300.

    Buy an 18-200 and solder it on to the d50, and give it to your wife.

    ;-)
     
  9. Pesto126

    Pesto126

    566
    Apr 13, 2006
    Northeast USA
    Ok.. great stuff everyone.. I really appreciate your advice and it does sound like the 18-200 might be a better option for me. The trade-off for IQ to have a nice all round lens is probably a-ok...

    Frank - I hear ya man.. need to get buffed a bit! Very rarely do we both use / need a DSLR at once so its the D80 for her as well - although... for the price of used D50's these days... not a bad idea.... hmmmm....

    Seriously.. thanks everyone!
     
  10. NaOH

    NaOH Guest

    I got both.

    The 18-200 is the lens that normally sits on my D80. When I need the extra reach (like at an airshow) I swap to the 70-300 VR.
     
  11. they are both great for the money
    i like the 18 end of the 18-200
    i would get them used and then sell the one you don't like
     
  12. Jonathan

    Jonathan

    676
    Jun 11, 2005
    Southern Maine
    I had both for quite a while but eventually kept the 70-300VR. I managed to get one that is very sharp.
     
  13. i never heard of one that wasn't
     
  14. Jonathan

    Jonathan

    676
    Jun 11, 2005
    Southern Maine
    The one I have is the 2nd one I've owned and is much better than the 1st one, especially at 300mm.
     
  15. ssjarz

    ssjarz Guest

    I have the D80 and the 70-300 and it is probably my favorite combo of all the lens that I own. I use it for flower pictures as well as birds, nature stuff. I don't think there is a better value, quality, light weight, out there right now for the price. Go get one, you won't regret it.
     
  16. Having had both I'd get the 70-300VR.
     
  17. smodak

    smodak

    Jun 11, 2007
    Franklin MA US
    I have both but I always reach for the 18-200.

    It's a fun lens..

    Disneyland2006-11-24_0027.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    Disneyland2006-11-24_0026.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    Disneyland2006-11-24_0025.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    Disneyland2006-11-24_0025_1.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    NewHampshireSept2006052.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    DSC_0165.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    DSC_0176.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    DSC_0204.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    DSC_0200.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    DSC_0181.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    DSC_0173.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    BostonCommons2007-02-09_0042.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
  18. Pesto126

    Pesto126

    566
    Apr 13, 2006
    Northeast USA
    ahhhh... now the lust is setting in to get both lenses!! :) 

    Might not be a bad option actually.. get both and see which one I like the best and just sell the other.. hmmmm...

    Thx again everyone... seems like they really are both winners!
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.