200mm Micro vs 70-180mm

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by Donzo98, May 21, 2007.

  1. Donzo98

    Donzo98

    Nov 10, 2005
    Merrick, NY
    If you had a choice between these two lenses which would you buy??
     
  2. rvink

    rvink

    Mar 21, 2006
    New Zealand
    Depends.

    For outdoor shots of bugs, flowers and plants, the subject is often inconveniently situated at ground level or halfway up a tree, places where it is difficult to set the tripod close enough for the shot. In that case I'd go for the 200mm micro for the greater working distance and magnification. The 200mm micro also has a reputation for superb IQ, probably the best of the micro-Nikkors (although it would have to be pretty good to beat my old AIS 105/4 micro...)

    For indoor work and situations where the environment is more controlled and it is easier to set the tripod within reach of the subject, the zoom factor of the 70-180 seems pretty attractive. I'd regard the 70-180 like a flexible 100mm macro. The 200mm may be too long for indoor work.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Nikkor 200mm f/4 micro vs. 70-180 micro Lens Lust Mar 17, 2012
200mm Micro Vs Sigma 150 2.8 Lens Lust Mar 1, 2012
70-200mm VR II vs. 200mm f4 AF Micro? Lens Lust Apr 20, 2010
nikon 200mm micro vs nikon 105mm vr? Lens Lust Jul 27, 2007
70-180mm micro vs. 70-200mm again... Lens Lust Feb 19, 2006