1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

24-70mm lens recommendation?

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by Voyager1968, Jul 7, 2008.

  1. I need to upgrade from my 18-55 kit lens. I am looking for a 24-70 or a 28-70 f/2.8 lens to go with my 70-200 Sigma. Thing is, I just can't afford a Nikkor right now, so I am looking at the third party lenses offered by Sigma, Tamron, and perhaps Tokina. Does anyone have experience with these lenses, and could/would you recommend one over the other?
  2. The reason I'm asking is that I've read some fairly lackluster reviews.
  3. bradNYC


    Mar 28, 2008
    I had the Tammy 28-75 2.8 recently. The new one with the motor built in...I liked it.
  4. The Ben

    The Ben

    Oct 17, 2007
    Houston, Tx
    buy a used 28-70 like I did. They can be had for less than $1000
  5. GKR1


    Apr 19, 2007
    San Diego
    Why not the sigma 18-50mm, it replaced my 18-70 lens and I could not be any happier. Here are a few examples from the last few days. It is great f/2.8 walkabout lens and it is sharp, contrasty, light, and does pseudo macro for $400. I also think you'll miss the wide end.

    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
  6. I have the Sigma 24-70 DG non-Macro version. From all of the negative responses that this lens gets, I just don't get it. The copy I have is very sharp and has no front or back focus issues. There is very slight softness at f/2.8 (when viewed at 100%) but some of that may be from the shallow depth of field at that large of an aperture.

    I picked up my copy used for $249 at my local camera shop. The customer who traded in the lens was changing to the Sigma 18-50 as he needed a wider lens than the 24mm. I have shot many social events with it, mostly with a SB-600 flash and it has not disappointed one bit. It seems to yield even better results on the D300 than what I got on the D70s. I was able to get a 2-week exchange guarantee if I was not satisfied with it. For the money, I feel as though it was worth every penny I paid for it.
  7. Thanks!

    The plan I have is to get the 24-70, and since I don't shoot A LOT of wide angle stuff, keep the 18-55 handy if I do need to go wide. Then, as funds allow, get, perhaps a 12-24 to go with the others.

    I just think I'd miss the 20mm between 50 and 70 more than I would the 6mm at the wide end.
  8. rvink


    Mar 21, 2006
    New Zealand
    I have not used either lens, but I have heard a lot of good reports on the Tamron 28-75 and Sigma 24-60 (not 24-70).

    Since you are shooting DX cameras, have you considered the 17-55? The gap between 55 and 70mm can easily be covered with a bit of foot zooming and cropping. Unless you particularly need a standard zoom which covers 70mm (maybe for portraits), the 17-55 seems to be the best standard zoom for DX. If that's too expensive, the Tamron 17-50 gets a lot of good reviews here.
  9. 005-1.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Here's a simple shot by my 24-70G. This is great lens and I don't regret having it.
  10. I agree - the Tamron 17-50 is a fantastic budget alternative to the Nikon 17-55, and the 50-70 gap can be easily compensated by "zooming" with your feet.


  11. Do you plan on using it with your D40? If so HSM is a must. I prefer the Sigma 17-70 2.8-4.5 in that range with HSM. The 24-70 doesn't have HSM AFAIK.
  12. I'm also looking for something faster but the biggest problem I have with the Sigma 24-70 is the use of 82mm filters. This would mean I would have to buy new UV, CPL, ND filters and that would really add to the price.

    I'm considering the Nikon 24-70 as I have the lower range covered with the 12-24. I've traded down from a Sigma 18-50/2.8 to the Nikon 18-70 as I found myself needing the 50-70 range is situations where I couldn't get a bit closer and I want to crop as little as possible.
  13. philcozz


    Jun 27, 2007
    Colchester, UK
    I highly recommend the Sigma 24-70... Mine has been solid in all uses.

    Some examples:
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Attached Files:

  14. It would be used most often on the D300 with the kit lenses reserved more for the D40 at the present time.
  15. gfx1


    Mar 31, 2008
    the Netherlands
    I have the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 and I'm not completely happy with it. It's heavy, not really wide on crop (the 36-105mm range is the same as the compact I got before that so it seemed a logical choice).
    My sample is a bit soft at f/2.8 or it front focuses a bit and manual focusing it doesn't improve.

    It's my least used lens, got an 18-135 for walk-around reach and a lightweight 35mm f/2 because that's the 18-135 weakest point.
    On fullframe it makes more sense (I tried it on an analog nikon)
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.