28-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED IF on FX?

Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
9
Location
Houston, TX
Does anyone have experience with the Nikkor AF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED IF lens on a D3? I'm looking for a good 'vacation' or carry-around lens for use on the D700 when it comes out...I haven't seen many samples off of this lens.

It seems nowhere carries the lens either...so some of you out there have to be taking pics with 'em. :)

Thanks,
Geoff
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,289
Location
Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.
I just sold one that my wife wasn't using anymore... it's a nice little lens, but sharper at the 200mm end than the 28mm end. As a general purpose walkaround lens I would prefer the 28-105 3.5-4.5 D - that lens is a real optical bargain and can be had for under $200 in like new condition these days!

Cheers

Mike
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
9
Location
Houston, TX
I've already got a 24-85mm AF-S, so if it's not as sharp at that range, I'm fine. :) I was mainly curious about how it is from 85-200. :)

Thanks,
Geoff
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,289
Location
Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.
I see. For the tele range the 28-200 G is a good budget choice (the 55-200 DX is slightly sharper at 200mm, but won't work on FX). Alternatives would be the 70-300 VR and maybe the new Tamron 28-300 VC, but both are bulkier and more expensive.

Cheers

Mike
 

fks

Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
2,756
Location
sf bay area
it's discontinued IIRC. it's a much better lens on a DX body because of the pincushion distortion at the long end on an FX body:

DSC0368.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


for the price, it remains a good lens, sharp and with good contrast.

ricky
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
1,002
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
i shot one on a d50 a few years ago...great lens, as good as the 18-70
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
574
Location
Escondido, California
I did a quick sampler on the D3. This was hand-held going from 28mm to 200mm using the lens indices. Very noticeable pincushion distortion beyond 85mm. Otherwise this lens can be a good light, snapshot lens...but don't set your expectations too high.

http://homepage.mac.com/paulfrye/28to200 mm G Lens test/large-1.html

As mentioned above, IMHO, it works much better on a DX camera where it is actually just a little short of amazing for such a small lens.

Regards,

Paul
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom