1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

28-70 recommendation

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by Riki, Jun 22, 2005.

  1. Riki


    May 7, 2005
    Warsaw, Poland
    I have been reading a lot about this lens in these forums, apparently held in very high esteem. This is one of the good glass which I dont have.
    Is this lens really so good. I have the 17-55 and the 24-85/3.5, which is not in this class, but in this range.
    The 17-55 is always on the camera, would I find myself using the 28-70 lens a lot too? Anybody has the 17-55 and the 28-70, both ? Which one do you use more ?
    Thanks in advance.
  2. Yes! I sold my 24-85/f2.8 for it and am delighted. It's on my D2X almost all the time. Try getting it used from someone on this site. You can pretty much trust just about anyone and you can save a bundle. It's not called the "monster" for nothing though. People will stare at you....in awe! It's a MANLY lens. :wink: :wink:

  3. F15Todd


    Feb 1, 2005
    I don't have the 17-55mm but I do own the 17-35mm. Since I got the 28-
    70mm the 17-35mm does not comeout that much. Very seldom do I go
    wider then 28mm. The Beast is a great lens and has taken over the
    number one spot in my bag.
  4. I just picked this up and let me tell you it is a gem great sharpness, wonderful color and contrast adn great bokeh.
    here is a shot from last night
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
  5. Riki


    May 7, 2005
    Warsaw, Poland

    Thanks for your replies. Wow, what a handsome dog and a wonderful picture, Mike.
    Great, now have something to look forward to viz(the Beast). Actually when I went digital with the D100, I had only one lens the 24-85/3.5-4.5, which honestly I loved. All the family enlargements in my house have been taken with this lens. Then the Lens Lust took over and I started the additions (14 at last count) , and the 24-85 got shelved and the 17-55 took its place. I always had liked this higher range though.
  6. Steve S

    Steve S

    Feb 1, 2005
    SE Florida
    RIch, there will probably never be one for sale here

    It's that good.
  7. The 28-70 is very good, but so is the 17-55. To be honest, it doesn't make any sense to have both. One or the other would just end up gathering dust. If you're happy with your 17-55, look elsewhere to get your Lens Lust fix. Jmho.
  8. MikeG


    Apr 30, 2005
    SF Bay Area

    Frank is right (as usual).

    If your shooting style tends to the long end - get the 28-70.

    If you shoot wide, the 17-55 will be just fine.

    As Simon says...it's only about 2 giant steps forward from 55 to 70mm. It's about 4 to 6 giant steps backward from 28 to 17 though.

    IMHO, you ought to keep the 24-85 and the 17-55. The 24-85 isn't a bad lens and is a very compact walkaround solution which is quite sharp as well as being more discreet than the beasties.

    To have both would be a great luxury, but redundant.

    Spend your LL dollars for perhaps a 70-200VR, an 85 1.4 or perhaps a 35 2.0. :wink:
  9. Riki


    May 7, 2005
    Warsaw, Poland
    Thank Frank and Mike for your comments. I understand though am a bit disappointed at not being able to buy it (LL). I love the 17-55, surely wouldnt want it to gather dust. Thanks for your advice.
  10. faenix


    Jun 21, 2005
    Bayside, NY
    I ran into the same predicament as you did and it looks like I'll be selling the 17-55 to finance a 28-70 conversion. I just missed the longer reach (albeit small) more than the wide angle aspect.
  11. twig


    May 23, 2005
    How about you try out a Tamron 28-75 XR DI?
    It's not nikon pro glass, but it is f/2.8 and the range you seek. It's under $400, has very nice close focusing down to like 10 inches, and VERY small. Have you held the 28-70 from nikon?

    Maybe it will help you decide if you need to sell that 17-55. I think it might make a nice complement to your existing lens.
  12. Riki


    May 7, 2005
    Warsaw, Poland
    Thanks Twig for your suggestion. I dont like third party glass. I havent seen the 28-70 but I believe it is big. I have a lot of primes covering this entire range like the 28/1.4, 45/2.8, 50/1.4, 60/2.8, 85/1.4. So probably will wait until the next offering from Nikon comes up. Hopefully a 28-70VR.
  13. MontyDog


    Jan 30, 2005
    #1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax;
  14. Riki


    May 7, 2005
    Warsaw, Poland
    Hi Paul.
    Come to think of it, never thought of HSC and the 17-55. Thanks for the great tip.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.