50mm 1.4 or 35mm F2

50mm F1.4 vs 35mm F2

  • 50mm F1.4

    Votes: 25 47.2%
  • 35mm F2

    Votes: 28 52.8%

  • Total voters
    53
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
584
Location
Mississauga, Canada
I am about to pull the trigger, 50 1.4 or the 35 f2, which one gives better IQ/bokeh, the 15mm is not a big concern,, neither the lower f stop, I like to walk!
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
378
Location
Jacksonville, FL (Formerly from Miami)
although I have never tried either lens, I just got the 50mm 1.8 and it has excellent IQ/boken. I would imagine that both lenses would be very close to mine as far as quality...

it really depends on if you are going to do close ups or slightly further distance. oh and the lower f stops definitely would make a difference I would imagine (even though it does concern you)

hope this helps?!
 
B

Bill N

Guest
I am about to pull the trigger, 50 1.4 or the 35 f2, which one gives better IQ/bokeh, the 15mm is not a big concern,, neither the lower f stop, I like to walk!

Sounds like you are describing the 50mm f1.8 then. Great IQ, great bokeh and less funds to purchase.

Not really apples and oranges, but close. The 35mm f2 is a great lens as is the 50mm f1.4. Good luck with your decision, hard to go wrong with either!

Edit to add that for "my" style of shooting I love the 35mm f2, so that is where my vote would go. I have the 35mm f2 and a 50mm f1.8.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
I voted for the 35/2. It's one of my least expensive lenses, but extremely versatile. I can rely on it to deliver great shots in a wide variety of situations. Here's a sampling.

closeups
60565342.gif
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


portraits
View attachment 219951

food
View attachment 219952

low light performance
View attachment 219953

architecture
View attachment 219954

scapes
View attachment 219955

and even fishy stuff ;-).
View attachment 219956
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
396
Location
Makati, Philippines
I voted for the 35/2.

and even fishy stuff ;-).
83047831.gif
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

This is the shot that sold me on the 35 :smile:
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
594
Location
Boynton Beach, FL
This is the shot that sold me on the 35 :smile:

Wow that is a great shot. I was originally sold on the Sigma 30 1.4 but I'm now rethinking it. I can get the 35mm for less and use the leftover money for a long zoom lens like the Sigma 70-300 APO.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,116
Location
Miami, Florida, USA.
Indeed both are great lenses. Like others, I find the 50mm more useful (in my opinion) on the FX format.
I have never used the 35mm lens wide open but I will check it. In the middle apertures range it works very nicely and it is sharp enough for me.
William Rodriguez
Miami, Florida.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
125
Location
SF
You said you are mainly interested in the difference in IQ & out of focus rendering?
I'm afraid you will mainly hear everones opinion on the useful 1. focal length or 2. aperature of these two lenses since both are great performers.

Since I currently own BOTH.... I have a prefrence base on how "I" shoot.

The 50 1.4 gets the most use by far. I shoot lots of low light indoors and I can reach the shutter speed of 1/80 with the 50/1.4 lens easier than 1/50 with the 35/f2 lens.
I also prefer how the 50mm lens renders out of focus areas as well as how it renders the subject. Its a bit more romantic to me than the 35/f2.
But thats just ME.
You will find inspiring images made by both lenses.

-jason

283502690_sBYPg-S.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
3,551
Location
Redmond, WA
It really depends on what you prefer to shoot. "Tastes great / less filling."

I also own both for a DX camera and find them excellent for their own uses. My 50/1.4 is better for low-light -- sharper at f/2 and of course it has f/1.4. It works great for portraits on a DX camera. The 35/2 is a great "leave it on your camera" lens and you can foot-zoom much of what you need.

Bokeh on the 50mm isn't too bad but you have to be a bit careful about the background. The 35/2 might be a tad better but with its shorter focal length and my preference to shoot it at f/2.8 or smaller, it doesn't make much diffference to me.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
584
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Thanks guys for all the advice, the reason I am so confused is because I have the 85 1.4, and I am planing on going FX and I sold all my zooms, so is 50mm to 85mm more useful or 35mm... confusing!
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
8,400
Location
LA (Lower Arkansas)
Thanks guys for all the advice, the reason I am so confused is because I have the 85 1.4, and I am planing on going FX and I sold all my zooms, so is 50mm to 85mm more useful or 35mm... confusing!

In this case, get both. If you're ready to drop the cabbage needed to go full-frame, an extra lens should be an afterthought. The 50 will be a "normal" lens, and the 35 will be a "normal/wide" lens.

I own both and can say that they're both wonderful performers on DX bodies.

Here's an example of what the 35 can do....

DSC_3283.gif
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



and the obligatory 100% crop...

View attachment 219962


And now the 50 1.4...

_DSC0939.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
6,091
Location
Alberta
My vote is for both. There both so great, its like trying to decide which child you love more. There both so special and differnt and wonderfull. Love them both and each has there place. Making the choice either or kind of diminishes there individual infinite value.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
691
Location
Orlando, Florida
I vote for the 35 f2. It will be my next purchase. For me, I have too many lenses covering the 50mm or fast aperture ranges. For example, I have the 60 f2.8 Micro and the 85 f1.4, not to mention a couple of zooms which cover 50mm or close. Therefore, for an APS camera, the 35 f2 is far more usuable. Your mileage may vary depending on what you already have. The 35 has a 52mm field of view on an APS camera.
 
T

The B

Guest
I voted for the 35/2. It's one of my least expensive lenses, but extremely versatile. I can rely on it to deliver great shots in a wide variety of situations. Here's a sampling.


food
67331458.gif
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

That looks as unhealthy as i'm sure it's tasty.
As to the lens decision: I think the 35mm is a bit more versatile on DX, like the 50would be on FX. I sold the 50/1,4 because i just couldn't stand the plastic, nevertheless it's optics were great. It all boils down to a matter of preference. And preferences need no inferences. Just buy what you like most.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
1,230
Location
Southern California
I am about to pull the trigger, 50 1.4 or the 35 f2, which one gives better IQ/bokeh, the 15mm is not a big concern,, neither the lower f stop, I like to walk!

Both are great lenses, but they do different "stuff". This isn't a question of which one, it's more of a which one FIRST.... You'll want both if you really want to play.

I voted for the 50 first, because if you push yourself to use it near the wide open mark you'll really learn to love depth of field fun....

After you've played with the 50 for a while, then the harder choice is one where you have to pick between the 30mm 1.4 Sigma and the 35mm F2 Nikon.
 
N

Nuteshack

Guest
sig 30, nik 50 and 85 1.4's -> the perfect prime trio.....;-)
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
1,230
Location
Southern California
sig 30, nik 50 and 85 1.4's -> the perfect prime trio.....;-)

I resemble that remark....... :biggrin:

Kap...
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
Misc: D300 / D40 / S51 / SB800 / SB600 / Bogen-Manfrotto 3221 + 490RC4.
Primes: 30mm 1.4 / 50mm 1.4D / 60mm 2.8 AF-S / 85mm 1.4D / 105mm 2.8D / 180mm 2.8D.
Zooms: 18x135 DX / 18x200 DX VR / 55x200 DX VR / 12x24 4.0 DX / 17x55 2.8 DX / 70x200 2.8 VR.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
5,364
Location
Austin
Just get 'em both, you can always sell one for about what you purchased it for.
 

Latest threads

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Forum GIFs powered by GIPHY: https://giphy.com/
Copyright © Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom