55-200 Vr

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by FullFrame, May 24, 2007.

  1. Any thoughts on this lens? I'm looking for a good walk-around lens and at $250 this one seems to be a steal. Anyone have any feedback - positive or negative?

    Thanks.
     
  2. Yeah, I've got that issue at home. While I respect Pop Photo I've also found that real world experience isn't always the same as their testing. Thanks, though.
     
  3. danmab

    danmab

    415
    Apr 26, 2007
    Wisconsin
    I bought this lens 2 weeks ago -- it is surprisingly sharp, even at 200. Just used it at a baptism, and while I regretted having something so long the pictures came out great.
    It does seem to be a little more "noisy" in it's AF-S mechanism than other AF-S type lenses, but that is getting reeally nitpicky.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR - First Impressions Lens Lust Dec 10, 2017
Nikon 200-500mm VR question Lens Lust Dec 5, 2017
Sports Lens: 200-500 f/5.6 or 300/2.8 VR I Lens Lust Dec 4, 2017
AF-S 300/4D vs 80-400 VR II Lens Lust Nov 29, 2017
A (VERY) Non Tech Background Comparison of the 200-500 VR Lens Lust Nov 5, 2017