80-200 2.8 or 70-300 vr

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by Ronnie, Aug 8, 2008.

  1. For outdoor sports shooting (good light) which do you recommend? I figure a used two-ring vs. a new vr would be close to the same price. I'm shooting on a D300.
  2. photolizard


    Mar 22, 2008
    If you have enough light the 70-300VR will focus a bit faster, but you need a lot of light to stop action or shoot at higher ISO with its smaller maximum aperture.
    The 80-200 is still selling well on ebay for used. They are fetching around $650 or more. The 70-300VR can be had for $409-459 brand new. I paid less and got a nice lightly used one.
  3. I would personally go for image quality over reach in this situation. I had an 80-200 (non-AF-S) and it was razor sharp. Image quality is on par with the 70-200 IMO and for the money, it is a bargain.
  4. whyhan


    Jun 14, 2006
    SF Bay Area
    Go with speed: 80-200 2.8, you already have a 18-200.
    Need more reach? Slap on a TC for your 80-200.
  5. I echo the above sentiments.
    I've used both lenses, and while the 70-300 VR is a great lens, the optical quality of the 80-200 is far superior. You can get a used two ring version for a (relatively) reasonable price.