80-400 VR does Snow Geese

Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
5,274
Location
Southeast PA, USA
I'm trying to hone my skill with the 80-400 VR at 400mm on a monopod. Sometimes I think I can get that combo to work... Here are some Snow Geese. All at 400mm, f/7.1, 200 ISO:

34567674-L.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


34567694-L.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


34567660-L.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Tried the same technique with Canada Geese and didn't get the same results:

34663080-L.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Would you think that this is more of an issue of my panning technique or did the lens just not focus? I had the camera set to AF-C...

Thanks for looking!

P.S. Are these images too large?
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
994
Location
Alabama
Jim,

They all look pretty good to me. Maybe you didn't post the Canada goose shot that you meant to, because there's nothing wrong with this one. :wink:
 
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
5,274
Location
Southeast PA, USA
Thanks Frank, but when you look at the pic of the Canada Goose at full size, it's quite soft. Maybe I should post a crop...

Here are two crops:
Snow Goose:
34665887-L.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Canada Goose:
34666530-L.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Thanks for looking!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
994
Location
Alabama
Jim Strathearn said:
Thanks Frank, but when you look at the pic of the Canada Goose at full size, it's quite soft. Maybe I should post a crop...

Thanks for looking!

Jim,

I forgot to answer your question. No, you images are not too large. Even a little bigger wouldn't be (except of course for the poor folks that are using dial-up).
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
149
Location
SF Bay area
Jim Strathearn said:
Are there any telltale ways of distinguishing between motion blur and just plain OOF?

Usually I looked for object at different distances, if there is something sharp somewhere then its OOF. If its motion blur then nothing in the picture is sharp. In your example its easiest to see at the grass, you can see on your goose pic it sharp just at the same distance with the goose head/eye.

--ricardo
 
B

bfjr

Guest
Jim Strathearn said:
Are there any telltale ways of distinguishing between motion blur and just plain OOF?

1st very nice shots. I swear by my Monopod (till I get a decent tripod)
As mentioned before motion blur means the entire frame is soft. OOF only particular area is soft. Hope that helps
 
Joined
May 25, 2005
Messages
3,181
Location
Kendalia, TX
I think these are great!

I really REally want a 80-400 VR. Of course, I want a 200-400 VR TOO!

But, the 80-400 VR seems to produce some sharp images.

Keep them coming.....
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Forum GIFs powered by GIPHY: https://giphy.com/
Copyright © Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom