1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

AF 80-200 2.8D or AFS VR 70-200 2.8G ?

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by stevo, Sep 18, 2008.

  1. stevo

    stevo

    295
    Aug 26, 2008
    Wexford, PA
    Quandary... I own The Beast (VR 200mm f/2G IF-ED) and it is a sensational lens... However, it is heavy and I've found that the keepers tend to come while stick mounted.. I've started shooting (indoor) national league basketball in professionally lit stadiums and I'm torn between the two lenses mentioned above. Any ideas or suggestions ?
     
  2. timkoo

    timkoo

    304
    Oct 9, 2007
    Chicago
    #1 send your 200/2 to me
    #2 I think you need to decide whether you need a. AF-S (Fast AF) and b. VR.
    If you're shooting baseball, I don't think you need too fast of AF for pitchers/batters (maybe for outfielders). Also if they're indoor and brightly lit and you have shutter speeds fast enough to freeze action, you probably don't need VR.

    My 2 cents
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.