1. 

   Haibane

   838

   Aug 14, 2006

   Smyrna, Georgia

   Iso 200 worked much better. Maybe it was the shadows...
   

    

   Last edited by a moderator: Mar 23, 2007

   Haibane, Mar 23, 2007

   #1
2. 

   dtbh

   2,124

   Mar 9, 2006

   Malaysia

   James, this is a decent 1st attempt.
   
   #1 seems a bit OOF. Perhaps the cam has been tricked by the loose strands of hair in front of the subjects lt eye. BTW I seldom go beyond ISO 400.
   
   #2 is better and this is my pick.
   
   Keep on playing with PS and sharing, James!

    

   dtbh, Mar 23, 2007

   #2

• 

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?