Attn Wedding Photgrhrs using 24-70 70-200 on crop sensors

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by DearLeader, Sep 22, 2008.

  1. I looking to set up shooting weddings starting next year. I've just got my 24-70 2.8 (yay!!), but while I was in the shop was playing around with the 70-200vr.... wow... it's awful big...

    I'm wondering what percentage of time is the 70-200 mounted on your camera during wedding shoots...

    I'll most likely be using D300 still next year for main body so wondering if I'll have most of the range I need with the 24-70...

    Was thinking about picking up the slower 70-300 instead?? Bad idea??
     
  2. For the few weddings I have shot, I have the 24-70 mounted on one body (FF), and the 70-200 mounted on the other (DX). Occassionally I swap them round, but most of the day they stay like this. I use both bodies equally. Sometimes I will pull out a third body and put a 85mm or a fisheye on it. I like to have the option of using multiple bodies for shooting weddings, both from a flexibility point of view, as well as for redundancy
     
  3. what percentage of the shooting is 70-200 on the dx?

    I was thinking DX 12-24 on one DX body and 24-70 2.8 on the D300...
     
  4. Probably around 40% at a guess, although it depends on the style of the wedding.
     
  5. If you are just starting out, the 85 f/1.4 would be a better choice.
    I have the 28-70 on a D300 and 85 on an FX most of the time. There are times, particularly the ceremony, when the 70-200 is a must. It's also a great lens for outdoors, but since I live in Ohio and there are very few good outdoor wedding days, most of my work is in dark, ugly churches with horrible light. The 85 f/1.4 is a godsend.
    That said, if you had the D700 with its improved noise, the 70-200 could probably do the job of the 85.
    But it is a beast of lens and makes people a little camera shy.
    Don't forget a 50 1.4.
     
  6. I carry two DX cameras (D80 and D300). One has the 70-200 mounted and the other has the 17-55/2.8 mounted at all times unless I pop on my 85/1.4 for creative shots. No doubt the majority of the ceremony images are shot with my 70-200 while the majority of the dressing room and reception pics are taken with my 17-55.
     
  7. sllywhtboy

    sllywhtboy

    78
    Jun 28, 2006
    detroit'ish
    i had a hard time getting properly exposed shots in a dark church w/ a 70-300 vr. flash wasn't allowed. although formals outside were fine w/ it.
     
  8. thanks everyone... that's what i suspected.... I'm gonna grab one... it's just so.... BIG.... and expensive as well...

    thought about the sigma 70-200 instead but .... it seems basically you get what you pay for and there is no way out of it... i would imagine the VR is super important when hand holding that thing in a 35c church....
     
  9. Zorac

    Zorac

    300
    Dec 22, 2007
    Calgary, Canada
    i use my 105vr a lot in churches without flash. i can't get the shutter fast enough to use the 80-200, and cant afford to upgrade the 80-200 to the 70-200 either. i find the 105 is a pretty good focal length anyway. the vr is amazing, i have shot as low as 1/15 sometimes and still came out with sharp shots hand held.
     
  10. bigwilly

    bigwilly

    143
    Oct 19, 2007
    Toronto
    The 17-55mm is perfect for large group formal & full length shots, the 24-70mm is a bit too long for a cropped sensor body in tight spaces. I hope you also have an 10-20mm or 11-16mm.
    I refuse to lug a 70-200mm around the whole day, instead I opt for an 85mm f/1.8 on my second body.
     
  11. Yes... I have the 12-24 of Tokina...

    It's seems some people are able to get away with 85mm on the long end... so I guess my next question would be to the people that use the 70-200... are you using it mostly on the wide end? like under 100mm?... crop sensor
     
  12. Hermit

    Hermit

    71
    Feb 11, 2008
    Minnesota, USA
    I use the 70-200 at the longer end for balcony shots, outdoor shots before and after to put a little distance between me and the subjects for informal candids of guests and wedding party members.

    I use the 17-55 for most posed group shots. You can probably use your 24-70 for this at it's mid-range setting.

    I use the 17-55 or 50 prime for reception shots because the light is usually poorest in the reception halls.
     
  13. My wedding setup consists of 2 D2Hs', one with 17-55 and the 70-200 on the other. I found that I don't do much shooting between 55-70mm, so switched from using the Beast and moved to the 17-55...not much difference in the weight department. It's almost an unbeatable combination...
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.