1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Best way to shrink 800MBs into 700MBs?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Steve S, Jul 13, 2005.

  1. Steve S

    Steve S

    Feb 1, 2005
    SE Florida
    I've managed to pare down through the culling process & conversion, 6 gigs of raw D2X shots from the Polish Folk Dance performance, into 800 MBs of full sized jpgs, saving them at "Good" quality. I did this in a batch process in NC4. I don't think I can delete any more shots, but still need to get them to fit onto a 700 MB CD. Do I start over again, but this time instruct the batch to make them 75% of their original size to best maintain quality, or shrink the already converted JPGs? What would you do?
  2. Steve:
    Yes you could do it again in a batch at 75 or 80%.
    But why not just burn them on a DVD and be done with it?
  3. Steve S

    Steve S

    Feb 1, 2005
    SE Florida
    Not everyone has a DVD player

    Granted many ppl do, not everyone has one, and since these copies are for the Polish Dancers to take home, I wanted to make sure everyone could play/edit/print them on their computers. Guess I could ask them what they would prefer, CD or DVD?
  4. Gale


    Jan 26, 2005
    Viera Fl
  5. Whatever method you choose to make them smaller (Image size or jpeg quality) do not use the already reduced files. If you reduce a file and then do it again the results are very noticably poor. If you need to be smaller start back with the full size file and go from there. Good luck.
  6. ckdamascus


    May 14, 2005
    New Jersey
    I love NC4, but it has a poor Jpeg compression to quality algorithm compared to Photoshop. Do your thing in NC4, but do the final jpegs in Photoshop. From my experience, Photoshop's resulting files were smaller and higher quality.

    The drawback here is now you will have probably have to output them to TIFFs first. You could go 8 bit TIFF ~35 megs for a D2X or 16 bit TIFF ~ 70 megs for a D2X. Ah... the only drawback to the mighty D2X. :) 
  7. Ken-L

    Ken-L Guest

    How about Irfanview, using it's Batch function?

    How well does it do in keeping the quality?

    When I use it to resize for postings on the web, I almost always have to re-sharpen the image.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.