I took these over the weekend with the D2X and 200-400VR. I calculated the keeper rate at around 10%. These are some of the ones I liked. I must confess its a real challenge getting clean pictures at 1/500s shutter speed for the prop driven aircraft. I also used the Gitzo 1228/Markins M10/Wimberly Sidekick. Hope you like them Supermarine Mk V Spitfire (which I believe served at Biggin during the Battle of Britain) {} The same aircraft landing View attachment 15074 Hawker Hurricane (Also served at Biggin) View attachment 15075 Taxiing Spitfires (into Sun) View attachment 15076 A pair of close formation P51 Mustangs View attachment 15077 Sea Vixen (Early carrier jet) View attachment 15078 Bringing things right up to date the Eurofighter Typhoon View attachment 15079 The rest can be found here http://www.pbase.com/pete_lethbridge/biggin_hill_2005&page=all
Thanks Dave I like the Sea Vixen best, in the original image you can zoom in to an amazing level of detail. With a hit rate of only 10%, I need to practice my panning more.
Pete, the images that you posted are wonderful, you nailed those shots. It is definately tough panning aircraft and shooting lower shutter speeds to retain some movement in the propellor...you did very well on the images that you posted. Thanks for sharing.
I can almost hear the RR Merlin engines singing their tune. The Spitfire is ACE but the pair of Mustangs make me what pump my fist in the air! These are truely wonderful captures. Thank you for sharing them.
Thanks everyone, here are some more you might like.. Hellcat (Steven Grey's at the controls) {} P47 Thunderbolt View attachment 15081 Mk IV Spitfire View attachment 15082 Now this was the hardest shot at 1/160 shutter speed (by mistake), however I got luck with the panning and it created a nice effect with the background. Seafury View attachment 15083 PBY Catalina View attachment 15084 Stearman Wingwalker View attachment 15085 F86A Sabre View attachment 15086 View attachment 15087 Tornado GR3 putting on the brakes View attachment 15088 Finally an SU26 View attachment 15089
Pete The second series is great also. You hit the mark on them. BTW that is a Bearcat not a Hellcat. My father flew both of those 'Cats. Russ
Thanks Gordon Yes, it was really the first true test for my 200-400. I also got very sunburnt...but learned a fair amount about the camera and technique.
Pete, Stunning pictures !!! Those images are very crispy and sharp, great colours as well. You also did a great panning job, nice to see that you didn't use ultra-high shutterspeeds. Great Britain has lots of small old airfields. I have been to the U.K. this year and I have to say that Britain has beautiful countrysides, lots of old buildings etc ... . I love the atmosphere. I find all of that back in your pictures. ps: Looks to me that the D2x and the 200-400mm make a dream team. Keep up the good work Pete Kind Regards Johan
Ok. that PBY is now my favorite followed by the F86 Sabre. Lets see some more. Surely if you are like me you have another 1000 or so shots. Thanks for sharing.
From one plane shooter to another Bravo! Getting those props to blur right is a bit of a chore, I tend to keep my shutter around 1/250 for the big lower RPM engines on the big bombers and larger fighters, and up to 1/500 for the smaller planes. Good use of the 200-400. I tend to use my 300 f4 AFS for my plane shots since it is easier to pan with than my 200-400VR. ( in fact a lot easier!) Nice work. Wade
Pete, Hi, these are extraordinarily great shots. I loved every one and that includes those on your website. Question... Do you think the 400 shot at f4 lens would have yielded better than a 10% satisfactory shot ratio using the same tripod/head setup? This question comes up from time to time, fixed or telephoto. I have been holding off for the day that I yet another $5000 or so of disposable income. But someday I will make the leap. Perhaps you have compared your experience with someone else at the air show or other shoots or have some experience with fixed vs tele zooms. Thanks for sharing your great shots, you have do great work.
Scott... I think a prime (if this is your question) is always going to be lighter. However, I found that at some points I wanted to reduce further than 200 to get the shot, so I definitely think you need the ability to zoom. This issue is not so much with the lens, its more to do with panning technique at slow shutter speeds (1/500 for prop plans to get prop blur). You are struggling with a fast moving plan and slow shutter, so your technique has to been spot on. With jets, you can crank the shutter speed up as far as it will go, because there are no moving parts to worry about. Regards Pete
Hi Paul Its not the weight that causes the issue, the sidekick is an absolute must as it allows you to balance the camera and lens perfectly. I did have a fair amount of OOF shots, which I can only attribute down to my less than perfect technique. It was the first time out with the lens (believe it or not, I've only had it 9 months or so!). When I say 10%, there were more shots in focus, but they were of the same scene. When you pan and press the button, it can rattle off 10 shots before you know it. So, by about mid-way through the show I'd filled 3 4Gb cards. Of these I've only used approx. 60. I've found some more I like, so I'll post these up over the weekend. I'd like to thank everyone for the comments though, very encouraging. :smile:
