Borrowed Sigma 120-300...didn't like

Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
1,302
Location
Belleville MI
What a MONSTER lens. Definitely won't work with the way I'm using the camera. Not only that, but there has to be something wrong with it, every single photo is extremely soft. Just glad I put the 85mm on for a very critical photo. About the only thing the lens did well was focused fast, even if it was soft. Guess I'll have to look at the 70-200, but would much prefer 300mm.

How fast does the 70-300VR focus compared to the 70-200VR?
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
966
Location
Nottingham, UK
It's probably front focusing if it's an older Sigma that's not been upgraded to work with newer DSLRs. Or did you try using it hand held? It's a bit too heavy for that!

The 70-300VR's focusing is pretty good in daylight, but don't expect it to be as good as any f/2.8 lens when the light starts getting low.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
4,657
Location
Athens Greece
Maybe you tested a lemon... I wouldn't call this soft...

D200 | Sigma 120-300mm with x2 EX TC @ 600mm
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


D200 | Sigma 120-300mm @ 300mm
View attachment 96804

...all handheld...:wink:
 
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
1,302
Location
Belleville MI
Maybe you tested a lemon... I wouldn't call this soft...
I'm glad I had the opportunity to use it. Even if it was dead sharp as your pictures are, it's not the right lens for what I'm trying to do. Too difficult to spin the zoom, swing the lens...and hold it steady, all at the same time. SWMBO breathed a huge sigh of relief when I said I didn't like it, LOL. I would have hated to spend that much money and not be the right lens.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
1,390
Location
Denver, CO
oh and how i like employee discounts, i dont even want to tell you how cheap i can aquire the 100-300 f/4... (which i will buy if nobody snatches it out from me)
 
R

Removed User 2

Guest
Please don't give the lens a bad name just because you had a lemon. That particular lens is top notch and every pro should consider it.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
4,657
Location
Athens Greece
Please don't give the lens a bad name just because you had a lemon. That particular lens is top notch and every pro should consider it.
Nenad, I know you will agree that he made it perfectly clear that it wasn't a bad lens rather than not the right lens.
I'm glad I had the opportunity to use it. Even if it was dead sharp as your pictures are, it's not the right lens for what I'm trying to do. Too difficult to spin the zoom, swing the lens...and hold it steady, all at the same time. SWMBO breathed a huge sigh of relief when I said I didn't like it, LOL. I would have hated to spend that much money and not be the right lens.
So, I guess he was neither giving a bad name or misleading people. Naturally, we don't all have the same needs and expectations.

Remember that you have the unique ability to produce images with lenses other people hate for one reason or another :wink:
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
1,027
Location
Annandale, VA
The second photo, you managed to hold a 300mm (450mm DX equivalent) lens at 1/40th shutter?!
This is with the 120-300 hand held as well 1/60th, 600m. I did have my shoulder against a tree trunk.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Thanks again Panos! :wink:

Rich
 
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
1,302
Location
Belleville MI
Please don't give the lens a bad name just because you had a lemon. That particular lens is top notch and every pro should consider it.
I've seen some amazing photos with the lens. The particular one I borrowed has something wrong with it. But, the lens is not what I'm looking for for hand held sports. It focused so unbelievably fast, just wish it hadn't been oof. The 2.8 is amazing. Accidently started with ISO at 1600 {DOH!}, and had some wildly fast shutter speeds. It's a bit on the heavy side, and I quickly learned how to handle the weight. My biggest complaint with the lens, was how difficult it was to dynamically adjust the zoom while holding the rig.
 
R

Removed User 2

Guest
I've seen some amazing photos with the lens. The particular one I borrowed has something wrong with it. But, the lens is not what I'm looking for for hand held sports. It focused so unbelievably fast, just wish it hadn't been oof. The 2.8 is amazing. Accidently started with ISO at 1600 {DOH!}, and had some wildly fast shutter speeds. It's a bit on the heavy side, and I quickly learned how to handle the weight. My biggest complaint with the lens, was how difficult it was to dynamically adjust the zoom while holding the rig.
It's one big and very heavy lens, that's for sure!
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom