Canon EOS 40D vs. Nikon D200

Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
Two great cameras cost about the same on the market. I was going to buy the D80 but now that I found I can get some discounts I want to spend saved $200-$250 on the body. :biggrin:

I am inclined to choose the D200 since I am familiar and I like Nikon's ergonomics. I also would like to know your honest and un-biased opinion on these two fine cameras. :smile:

Thanks!
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
10,266
Location
Texas!
I shoot both Canon and Nikon...but if I were you, I would get the ND200. That has been a superb camera for me.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
2,576
Location
Camberley, UK
I'd agree with Sen, but would ask one question - do you have any other kit already? If you have a host of Nikon or Canon lenses, then it may be worth sticking to the brand you have.

If you're starting from nothing, then go Nikon - but then I'm biased...

:biggrin:
 
R

RichNY

Guest
Having both I would definitely prefer the Canon 30/40D compared to the D200 just for the ISO performance.
 
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
5,482
Location
NY
Also consider what types of lenses you'll want to use.
Canon has fast AF/fast aperture primes in the sub-200mm range that are affordable. Nikon really doesn't. If you shoot sports (particularly indoors), that might be a factor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
RichNY,

Is 40D a clear winner when taking pictures in RAW? Or the difference is marginal and only noticeable at ISO level 800 and above?

Thanks!
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Also consider what types of lenses you'll want to use.
Canon has fast AF/fast aperture primes in the 200mm range that are affordable. Nikon really doesn't. If you shoot sports (particularly indoors), that might be a factor.
Mainly landscapes. It'd be Tokina 12-24mm but could have chosen Sigma 10-20mm too.
 
R

RichNY

Guest
RichNY,

Is 40D a clear winner when taking pictures in RAW? Or the difference is marginal and only noticeable at ISO level 800 and above?

Thanks!
It doesn't matter whether it is raw or jpg, the difference isn't marginal and is very noticeable at ISO 800 and above. If someone was going to always use the camera in the studio or well lit environments then the Nikon is the way to go especially in the area of flash.

The D300 gives the best of both worlds.

For me high ISO was/is very important since I shoot youth ice hockey at ISO 1600-3200 on a regular basis-YMMV.
 
R

RichNY

Guest
Mainly landscapes. It'd be Tokina 12-24mm but could have chosen Sigma 10-20mm too.
If you are shooting landscape with a tripod then the ISO performance isn't a big issue and the D200 is the nicer camera. As a general purpose camera where you will find yourself shooting in lower light or if you are shooting faster moving objects then increasing ISO comes into play.
 
T

tintingkc

Guest
I agree with RichNY. I looked at the 40D when looking to upgrade my Canon gear. Ended up getting the D300 instead. The Nikon bodies are layed out much better in my eyes. Set up like a camera should be. I do a lot of low light photography so my needs were different. Either camera is great. I would go to your local shop and play with both and fire off some pics.
I feel you should be comfortable with your gear. You can't go wrong either way. I got great pics with both cameras. Just enjoying using my equipment more with the Nikon bodies.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #11
Okay, it will be the 40D then. Just for the benifit of having better ISO performance in low light conditions. :smile:
 
R

RichNY

Guest
If you do go Canon I would make a few suggestions:
- Consider a used 30D as a much less expensive option than the 40D
- Switch to Canon's 10-22 ultrawide as it is worth the price difference
- Consider Canon's 17-55 IS lens and if that is out of the price range go with the Tamron 17-50
- Join the POTN forum; they have a very active Buy/Sell forum
- If any of the Canon stuff in my signature line becomes part of your shopping list please PM me- I am getting ready to sell it all
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #13
I am on a tight budget so I won't be considering the EF-S 10-22mm or the EF-S 17-55.

P.S Do you know if Tamrons, the 17-50mm or the 28-75mm come with BIM (Built-in motor) for Canon bodies? :smile:

Thanks!
 
R

RichNY

Guest
I am on a tight budget so I won't be considering the EF-S 10-22mm or the EF-S 17-55.

P.S Do you know if Tamrons, the 17-50mm or the 28-75mm come with BIM (Built-in motor) for Canon bodies? :smile:

Thanks!
Yes they do. If you are really on a tight budget the 20D will give you the same images as the 30D. The upgrade from the 20D to 30D was relatively small and evolutionary, nothing at all revolutionary.

What is your budget for camera and lenses? You might be better off with a lower end camera (Nikon or Canon) and spending the difference on your lenses where it really matters.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #15
Yes they do. If you are really on a tight budget the 20D will give you the same images as the 30D. The upgrade from the 20D to 30D was relatively small and evolutionary, nothing at all revolutionary.

What is your budget for camera and lenses? You might be better off with a lower end camera (Nikon or Canon) and spending the difference on your lenses where it really matters.
I asked your opinion on 40D & D200 and you are recommending me different lenses and other cameras.

Thanks again!:smile:
 
R

RichNY

Guest
I asked your opinion on 40D & D200 and you are recommending me different lenses and other cameras.

Thanks again!:smile:
I gave answered your exact question and then offered you the same advice I'd give to a family member or friend: if you have a limited budget it serves you better to put it into quality glass not a better body.

I hope you enjoy whatever kit you determine best meets your needs.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #17
I gave answered your exact question and then offered you the same advice I'd give to a family member or friend: if you have a limited budget it serves you better to put it into quality glass not a better body.

I hope you enjoy whatever kit you determine best meets your needs.
I don't think price/performance of the EF-S 10-22mm is any better to that of Tokina 12-24mm. Optically it is marginally better than Sigma’s 10-20mm which is also wide but1.5x cheaper. Besides, I mentioned in my original post I am getting discounts, mostly on new gear.

I understand you have a set of equipment which you have used and would recommend it to anyone. I've considered my options, on cameras with APS-C size sensosr it will be wide angle lens from Tokina and standard lens, probably from Tamron.

Thanks!
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom