Catchlight too big???

Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Finally got to use my new octabox with my AB800 this evening. I was able to capture this shot. No cropping, the Woody's skin tutorial applied and that's about it.

While editing, I noticed that the catchlights from the octabox look HUGE. Is it too big for this photo??? Does it work? I love the shot, but I don't really like the size of the catchlights.... Any comments welcome.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
35,011
Location
Arizona
Real Name
Chris
I see this effect in some magazine shots. I kinda like it - it's shows the studio lighting equipment, and so defines the type of shot. That focuses the audience in, so your photo gets compared to professionally done photos. That's a good thing.

Aesthetically, it depends on what you are trying to communicate with the picture. As a commercial shot it's a good thing, as it is, in part, about the photograph. As a portrait, perhaps it distracts from from her just a little bit.
 
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
4,824
Location
Somewhere in the Oklahoma woods
Keith,

I'm not really involved in portraiture, so my opinion is strictly from a viewer's position.

Personally, I don't care for really large catchlights. Back a million years ago when I was trying my hand at portraiture, I built a 36x36 soft-box light and was really disappointed in the results...........much as you seem to be. When I scraped it and built a smaller one I was happier................not enough happier to end up a portrait photog, but happier!:biggrin:
 
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Thank you Chris. I don't think I'm disappointed, I'm just not sure if this is a good thing or not? 36x36?? My octabox is 47 inch, and it just looks so big I'm not sure what to think about it.
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
4,291
Location
Youngstown, Ohio
Keith, here is a comparison for you. This is a portrait I made a couple of weeks ago using a 36x36 softbox at about 5 feet from the girl at a little above eye level...I was thinking the catchlights were too small. What do you think?

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


How close was your octabox?
 
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Thanks for the comparison image John! I had the octabox about 2-3 feet from her, probably closer to two feet. I guess I need to move the octabox back a few feet, and that would get the size of the catchlight down a bit. I was between 1/2 and 1/4 power, maybe I'll move it back and crank up the power a little.
 
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
4,010
Location
Youngsville (The edge of nowhere), North Carolina
This is the classic rock and a hard place problem.

If you want wrap around lighting with soft diffused shadows you should keep your light source within a distance equal to it's size/diameter. If you have a large light source, you're going to get a better "quality" of portrait light, but if you move it close you're going to get large catchlights.

On the other hand a smaller light source is going to give you a "harder" edge to your shadows but a smaller catch light.

It's a Catch-22.

My litmus test for any of these questions is what I see published in fine fashion magazines, and catchlights are all over the place there. There are round ones from ringlights, square ones from softboxes, linear ones from fluorescent panel lights, you name it. Personally, I don't consider it a factor. There are too many compromises in areas more important to a good portrait if you want tiny catchlights so I just concentate on the big issues and let the minor fall where they may.

What does bother me greatly about this particular image is the way the mouth is cropped off. Ouch!
 
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Much appreciated Woody!! I didn't mean to chop her lips off, but my shooting space was limited, and for some reason, I wanted to use my 70-200 for a shot or two...this was the tightest shot I could take, and I was just experimenting.
 
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
138
Location
Bluffton, SC
Finally got to use my new octabox with my AB800 this evening. I was able to capture this shot. No cropping, the Woody's skin tutorial applied and that's about it.

While editing, I noticed that the catchlights from the octabox look HUGE. Is it too big for this photo??? Does it work? I love the shot, but I don't really like the size of the catchlights.... Any comments welcome.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Keith, I think you did an awesome job! I love the catchlights. As Woody implied...catchlights in fashion mags are all over the place. They get paid tons of money for those shots, I see nothing distracting at all! Keep it up !
 
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Thanks alot David. It's beginning to grow on me. :) I guess since this was my first REAL studio lighting shot the catchlights just seemed odd to me.

I appreciate all the feedback!!
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
425
Location
Missoula, MT
What does bother me greatly about this particular image is the way the mouth is cropped off. Ouch!
Definitely see the point...but with the mouth cropped it really places a lot of emphasis on the eyes...and your wife has beautiful eyes...not a bad thing IMHO. Probably not the way you're going to want to do all of your portraits...but it doesn't hurt to do something a little different here.
 
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Thanks Doug. We're not married yet. :biggrin: This is not my typical kind of shot, portrait or otherwise. I'm so happy to finally have some studio lighting that I was just trying different things and testing...
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
1,643
Location
Central, FL USA
Keith,
love the shot, the catchlights are fine...lighting is very good...
I would have cropped the top....cropped to the highest eyebrow, her left eye...
then the emphasis goes to the eyes...
 
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
Thanks Michael!! That crop is right out of the camera... Here's what I came up with based on your suggestion...

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
300
Location
Eastern Shore, Maryland
Keith,
I like the last cropped version. I never done studio shots, but I was wondering, if her face was facing more toward the camera, would the catchlight be on the white area of her eyes? I'd say do some more experient, Keith, since you have the equipment. Maybe you can look at fashion magazines for comparison.

Leo
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom