I was on vacation in Canada and stopped in to Buchart Gardens. I took the same shots with three lenses that I had on hand. They were really just snap shots for an overview of one of the garden areas. When I took them, I was not thinking about doing a comparison so the f stops are different and they were PP'd in a rush so they are not the same saturation, sharpness etc. I saw a thread discussing the difference between the lenses. I posted the images to that thread. It occured to me that others may enjoy seeing the difference. The photos posted in the other thread will probably get lost at the tail of the thread so I am re-posting them here for anyone who might care to see the difference. This is a 10.5 fisheye Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) This is the same 10.5 defished in NC 4.2.1 View attachment 8728 Here is a 12-24 set to 12mm. I was using a ND filter plate and the attachment caused vignetting so I had to do a bit of cloning to fill in the dark edges but it still works for comarison of FOV View attachment 8729 This next one is the 17-55mm set at 17mm View attachment 8730 Anyway, the photos are not very good but it is a representation of the area of coverage of the different lens and settings. Ignore DOF, sharpening and color differences please. This is totally not a controlled or scientific comparison as I wasn't even considering it at the time of the shoot. Hope this is somewhat helpful to some who wondered.