Controversy time the 85/1.8 is as good as the 85/1.4

Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
5,701
Location
Tripping the light fantastic
on the D3... Sorry tried it today and ... the infamy!!! I spent more than I should have for the same focal length :wink:

In all honesty the blurry background and subject would have been the same high smoothness and IQ with the 1.4 but... what do I know... Let the vilifications begin... But before you do, look at this image, 85/1.8 at 1.8 on the D3 in the background not that you'd notice but it is a busy city street... And is that a sharp portrait with the smoothness in all the right places, huh! :eek: Yea shocking to me first and foremost - the 85/1.8 is as good as the 85/1.4 sorry to disappoint (Me mainly...)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
321
Location
USA
The differences between the two really come out when you have small bright highlights, or bright/dark complex patterns in the background. When you have to shoot in those situations, the 1.4 shines.

I once shot some portraits with a grass field and parked cars in the background on a sunny day. The results were excellent with the 1.4. No one could ever guess what the background was. I also have the 1.8, and I know it would not have been as good.
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
8,447
Location
Wilmington, NC
That's what I'm saying! lol.. no thanks, I'll stick with my lowly D300. :biggrin: I killed the AF on a Canon 50 1.8 in one year. I'll stick with my Nikons!
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
5,701
Location
Tripping the light fantastic
thx, I just bought John's 1.4 and sold my 1.8
but it's heavier so it's gotta be better, right ?
No, it is heavier cause it has more glass in it :biggrin: Does it mean it is better - I gained 40 pounds in a little over a year, I am now heavier than a year ago, does that make me better :wink::biggrin: Just ribbing ya but I feel like I spent $700 more than I should have for very similar results (Actually, pssssst *whispering* that shot above with the 1.8 is a better picture than any I have ever captured with the 1.4 ... that was shocking to me so... I thought I'd share my new found observations - as such going forward my answer to all 1.8 vs. 1.4 debate will be "Splitting hairs" :wink:)
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
278
Location
Albany OR
Sorry Dude but to be the professional model you must be heavier and faster and if you are like me, I think you may be heavier and slower. Ribbing aside it is better at 1.4. everywhere else probably very close. I like lighter so lighter and maybe slower is better for some. And lighter lenses make me faster......
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Considering that you may have proven I wasted $1000 on the 1.4 version, I should count myself lucky that all I'm getting is a red X.

Unfortunately, that's true for every image hosted by photobucket.com. I can't access their homepage or anything from their site.

Does anyone else have this problem? Or a solution?
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
1,162
Location
lafayette, louisiana
Well,
personally I think they are both superb lenses. I sold my 85 1.8, but have rented the 85 1.4 from lensrentals.com for I do believe 60 bucks for the week. My buddy who is full time wedding photogs main lens is his Canon 85 1.2. I wonder if Nikon will be updating their 85mm to a 1.2? After printing some of his wedding pics for him I noticed that he will have the subjects yes parallel with the lens so both eyes will be in focus and he only shoots it wide open. 385 dollars for an 85 1.8 is bargain in my book.
Kevin P.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
5,701
Location
Tripping the light fantastic
Considering that you may have proven I wasted $1000 on the 1.4 version, I should count myself lucky that all I'm getting is a red X.

Unfortunately, that's true for every image hosted by photobucket.com. I can't access their homepage or anything from their site.

Does anyone else have this problem? Or a solution?
What do you use to surf the web, Explorer, Firefox, Safari? That's a bummer but I have no idea why you are getting a red x ... But no, the 1.4 is worth it but the 1.8 is just as good IMHO for what I shoot - having the 1.4 and being paid for - I'll keep it for a few years - plus it is the second copy I buy in less than two years...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
N

Nuteshack

Guest
sorry Dude..but i see nothing compelling about this photo regaurdless of the lens used. and further more, to make any claims by it is just plain silly!!! .....(IMHO)

85 1.4 ->

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

:Smoking:
 
T

TristanCardew

Guest
Nute, would it be possible to post these photos pre-processing? The Dude's photo was unprocessed, apart from watermark - I don't feel it's an even competition.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom