CS #29 - "Out of the ordinary"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
We’re now open for business. Post your images in this thread.

There are many different forums here at the Café, but many of us tend to focus on just a few of the topics. I was inspired this past week when two seasoned photographers, Wade (Commodorefirst) and Andreas (AFX), posted images in areas that were outside their primary centers of attention.

Therefore, the theme for this week’s Collective Shoot is out of the ordinary. Choose a subject, style, or treatment that is represented least frequently in your portfolio. In my case, that would be anything other than color photographs of wildlife and flowers. Maybe you’re a generalist with respect to subjects, but you don’t normally do black and white, sepia, selective partial color, artistic transformation, etc. – do it a little differently this time. And, tell us what you learned.

Too busy to plan anything different this weekend?? – Make it a snapshot; share it with your friends here at the Café; and tell us how you would have improved it if you had the time.

Rules:
Shooting period: Friday (April 6) through Sunday evening (April 8) [your local time]

Posting period: Friday April 6 through Tuesday April 10

Please submit no more than 2 photos.

Have fun:biggrin: :biggrin: !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
I live only 7 miles from Lancaster, a city that was settled in the 1700’s. There are many old houses and churches, but I’ve never even attempted to photograph them. Conditions were not nice this morning – it was windy and cold and snow flurries were in the air. I learned pretty quickly that I had to use a lot of exposure compensation and that finding the “perfect angle” was d…. near impossible.

I think that the first building was originally the rectory for a nearby church, but it now serves as an office for an architect. [don’t know who put the gingerbread on that roof line]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



The second is an Episcopal church – watch out for the archers in the battlements.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
2,357
Location
colorado
hi all

i never skied on the moon before :biggrin: :tongue:



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Messages
2,383
Location
Arizona, USA
Although I shoot similar shots to this all the time, this one is different for me because I'm using external flash to help light the building a little. It's the first time I've tried it, because I'm using the 20mm lens I just bought, and it's wide enough that I can get close enough to use the flash, and still get some background into the photo.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


I felt the photo would have been better if the dark side had been lit with the sun instead of the flash, however, it looks to me like the flash did improve detail in the shaded side.

This was also my first attempt to use a colored filter, which was a magenta resin filter, cc40m. My first impression from the results is that it's worth the effort of putting it on the lens.

These tiny houses are all over the desert, and I wonder if they were ever used, or just built to take advantage of homesteading.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
978
Location
Viera Fl
Here is a DIFFERENT for me and a new DIFFERENT LENS too!!!....lolol
Cruisin down the river..Just a little run-about.:>))))
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Although I shoot similar shots to this all the time, this one is different for me because I'm using external flash to help light the building a little. It's the first time I've tried it, because I'm using the 20mm lens I just bought, and it's wide enough that I can get close enough to use the flash, and still get some background into the photo.

I felt the photo would have been better if the dark side had been lit with the sun instead of the flash, however, it looks to me like the flash did improve detail in the shaded side.

This was also my first attempt to use a colored filter, which was a magenta resin filter, cc40m. My first impression from the results is that it's worth the effort of putting it on the lens.
Nicely done Miriam. I hope the wind wasn't blowing -- that buildng looks like it wouldn't stand much wind:smile: .

As has been said many many times, "It's all about the light." While shadow recovery can be done in PP, it's never quite the same, and it's far more satisfying to get it right out of the camera. I keep saying that, but I don't use the flash as much as I should :redface: . Neither do I use colored filters, in spite of the fact that Iliah has pointed out their utility on numerous occasions. Gonna have to do it right!
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Messages
2,383
Location
Arizona, USA
Nicely done Miriam. I hope the wind wasn't blowing -- that buildng looks like it wouldn't stand much wind:smile: .

As has been said many many times, "It's all about the light." While shadow recovery can be done in PP, it's never quite the same, and it's far more satisfying to get it right out of the camera. I keep saying that, but I don't use the flash as much as I should :redface: . Neither do I use colored filters, in spite of the fact that Iliah has pointed out their utility on numerous occasions. Gonna have to do it right!
Thanks, Bob! That building must be sturdier than it looks, considering the extreme winds we get around here.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
978
Location
Viera Fl
Sorry Bob, exif is at pbase
http://www.pbase.com/techwish/image/76754027
New lens is the 70-300 VR
Boat is bigger than a bread box...lolol
I live 1/2 block from river. I walk down there often. Osprey nest there also.
1/1000, 5.6, manual mode, center weight, 280 mm, WB 5600, ISO 200, D200,
4/6/7 time 5:11 PM EDST

Osprey shot a bit different while there yesterday
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


EXIF here
http://www.pbase.com/techwish/image/76739222
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
548
Location
hogtown (Toronto, Canada)
I rarely take pictures of flowers (or living things in general), so here is my attempt. I took these photos of some tulips growing in a potted plant on my desk.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


This one looks like it's at the end of it's days.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
8,291
Location
Central Virginia
CLS does landscape

Very good stuff from everybody so far.

I'm pretty much a newb when it comes to using the CLS, and I'd never tried it at all with a landscape until this morning. Last night's snow tempted me to try to use flash to isolate this small beech tree from the background.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

[D200, 17-55/2.8, f/8 @ 1/250, ISO 100; (1) SB600 & (1) SB600 controlled by on-board flash]

Full disclosure: I did use a curves layer to bump up the contrast between the tree and the BG a bit, and also increased the saturation of the birdbath with a hue/saturation layer.

I found Miriam's (very well done) example using flash in a landscape application interesting. While she used flash to more closely match the exposure of her subject with the background, my intent was to give the subject a radically different brightness level compared to the BG.
 
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #13
Victor, we've had nothing but cold wind and snow today -- your flowers hit the spot:smile: . [Our daffodils, hyacinths, magnolias, etc. really look sick after the weather we've had the last couple of days.]

Dave, that's such an obvious application of flash that I've never even considered it :redface: -- I always either rely on PP for subject isolation or take what I can get with DOF. Thanks for turning on my lightbulb!
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
300
Location
Tampa Florida
Great shots everybody!!!

note to self: in the future don't foget the flash - D'oh:redface:

OK, I went to Big Cat Rescue, a non-profit safe haven for retired, neglected and abused cats (circus, breaders, poachers, drug dealers.....) where they are cared for until they pass on. I was close enough to pet them - but withstood the temptation knowing it would be difficult to continue photography with body parts missing :smile:

I never tried b/w so for these I used the setting on the D200

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Hope you like them
Still learning
Peace
Mark
 
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #16
Great shots everybody!!!

note to self: in the future don't foget the flash - D'oh:redface:

OK, I went to Big Cat Rescue, a non-profit safe haven for retired, neglected and abused cats (circus, breaders, poachers, drug dealers.....) where they are cared for until they pass on. I was close enough to pet them - but withstood the temptation knowing it would be difficult to continue photography with body parts missing :smile:

I never tried b/w so for these I used the setting on the D200
Good ones Mark:cool: . In one way or another this CS, so far, seems to be a lesson in the use of flash -- either didn't use it, but should have; or tried it with these results. I think that many of us, including me, could learn to make better use of our flashes.
I was curious about the histograms and peeked at your images in my editor. I've seen only a few B&W's straight out of the D200, and didn't realize that it produces true 8-bit files rather than the 24-bit files that result from the commonly used desaturation method for B&W. I like that because then I know that the black is a "pure black".
 
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
10,383
Location
Western Slope of Colorado
I'd intended to practice using the wide-angle lens Saturday. I drove about 50 miles to a 3.5 acre garden with tens of thousands of tulips at a couple's home, and I wanted to capture some low, sweeping shots. These gardens are opened up each Spring as a fund-raiser for the city's various parks.

Sadly, Friday evening we had record cold temperatures (18 °F), and most of the flowers did not fare too well . . .

Instead, I resorted to mostly isolation shots. The one below is a bit different for me, since I tried using a long focal length to help with the isolation (200 mm, f/5, 1/1000 s). In my experience, this technique works best when there is a large distance between the subject and its background - which wasn't quite the case here.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


The second isolation shot below is more typical for me: 90 mm macro at f/4:

View attachment 88814

Nice topic, Bob - thanks for hosting it. It has been both enjoyable and instructive!


Eric
 
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #18
I'd intended to practice using the wide-angle lens Saturday. I drove about 50 miles to a 3.5 acre garden with tens of thousands of tulips at a couple's home, and I wanted to capture some low, sweeping shots. These gardens are opened up each Spring as a fund-raiser for the city's various parks.

Sadly, Friday evening we had record cold temperatures (18 °F), and most of the flowers did not fare too well . . .

Instead, I resorted to mostly isolation shots. The one below is a bit different for me, since I tried using a long focal length to help with the isolation (200 mm, f/5, 1/1000 s). In my experience, this technique works best when there is a large distance between the subject and its background - which wasn't quite the case here.

The second isolation shot below is more typical for me: 90 mm macro at f/4:

Nice topic, Bob - thanks for hosting it. It has been both enjoyable and instructive!


Eric
Too bad about the temperatures and the tulips -- we've had similar weather, but at least our tulips have not yet bloomed. Right now, Eric, yours look awfully good to me:smile: .
Yep, there's only a couple of ways to get isolation directly out of the camera -- control the light (either positively with flash or negatively with gradient filter) or use as long and wide open a lens as you can (or a combination of these approaches). When the conditions are such that these approaches are not practical, masking and darkening/blurring in PP works, but may not be the most satisfying.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
1,145
I don't take too many flower pix -- I'm certain that I've never posted one here. In keeping with the shoot's topic, I took the opportunity to take a newly acquired lens (Zeiss ZF 25mm 2.8) for a test drive and explore its close focusing capabilities.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #20
I like those Keirin, especially the first one. The colors are great in both, but the composition of the first seems to grow on me -- it keeps pulling me back for another look. I expect we'll be seeing a lot more from that lens in the Macro/Flowers/Greenery forum:smile: .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom