D1H vs. D2H

I have a D1H and I wanted to know how much better the photo quality would be if I got a D2H. Does the D2H perform better in a low light situation, like in a gym shooting sports? With the D1H I shot at ISO 1600, using a Nikon 70-300 VR 2.8 lens set at 2.8 with the Flouresent WB setting and at 180th/sec, I tried 250th but the photos looked too dark on the LCD, the photos overall were ok, but not up to what I like tho.

Will I see a difference in using the D2H? I would love to get one, but I need to know if the benefits will outweigh the cost.

If anyone knows of a good D2H for sale that is reasonable price wise let me know.

Any comments or feedback is welcome.

Thanks

 

So you think I am better off sticking with the D1H? I have to send it to Nikon, I got it off ebay and I think it needs adjustment, for some reason I put it in shutter mode with shutter set at 1500, bright sunny day and A was reading 5.6 I think, but the photos looked dark on the LCD, so I just switched to M and set it at 1000 at f/8, I think it needs to be looked over and adjusted, I should hae my D1 back soon from Nikon, it was being cleaned.

 

I'd love to have a D2Hs, but at $3400 thats a little much, I did email Twig about his D2H, which is much less, so we will see.

 

I just got the expodisc today actually, I am going to try it out, I think my D1H needs to be adjusted and needs to go to Nikon for service. Right now I am liking my D1 more than the D1H.

Twig did you get my email back this afternoon? You had asked me a few questions as you saw the PSU Athletics in it.