Okay, I have pretty much decided that the D2h can work for me since I generally do not resize for printing beyond 11x17". Possibly 13x19 with my Epson 2200 printer. Even with some judicious cropping I can still get a pretty good even excellent print in a 11x17 print from a D2h. I always shoot RAW. My question for those D2h users in the forum... Do you think the improvements of the D2hs will make a better print at the sizes I mentioned? I think the speed and buffer of the D2h is more than suffienct for me compared to the d2hs. I have heard that the main difference is in JPEG shooting. Is this true or do the changes also effect raw images? Is there a difference in the amount of images per battery charge or in iTTL flash system? Sorry to compound so many questions. forgetting the price difference, just comparing camera to camera, is there likely to be a difference in raw files produced between these two cameras? I am not clear on what the difference is in color matrix II in the D2hs and the color matrix used on the D2h. It seems that the main difference is in the buffer size and jpeg image processing. Am I right or is there more that I am not seeing?