UncleFrank said:James Grove seems to have done quite a bit of comparision testing between the d2h and d2hs. Here's a link to his DPR profile, so you can pick through his archives.
jklofft said:And at least from what I saw, there was improvement in noise in the jpegs, but shooting NEF and using NeatImage, the two images are essentially the same.
Jonathan F. said:
Calfee said:Does anyone know if you can open RAW files from a D2Hs in PS CS directly, or do you need Nikon Capture?
I would assume you can open JPG with no problem in PS CS. Correct?
Calfee said:Thanks James. What is ACR?? I have only used PS CS. I thought that PS CS (ot the new version CS2) will open the NEF files from the D2hs and D2X.
BTW, do you think that JPG fine images straight out of the camera are good enough to use when I shooting an event where the image count is pretty high and the time to process isn't that much?
Calfee said:Thanks. I shoot misc sporting events and have been hoping the the D2Hs JPG files will be better on the D2Hs versus my D2H. I am looking for improvements in color, Auto WB, and noise. From the sound of it, you think this camera will fit the bill. Correct?
Calfee said:Thanks again. I have a D2H (about 6 months old), and I also bought a second D2H from B&H just before they went out of stock (but have not even opened the box b/c I'm not sure I will keep it). This second camera only cost me $1,999. That said, the D2Hs is about $1200-$1400 more than the new D2H I have, and I am wondering if the D2Hs is really worth the extra money. What do you think?