D2x & 70-200 VR Performance

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by bravocharlie, Jun 12, 2005.

  1. If you ever wondered how effective the VR is on a Nikon lens, check out these shots:

    D2x, AutoFocus Continuous (Single Area), Aperture Priority, f/4, 1/1250, WB Auto

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Very cool shots! Don't you just love the D2X? :)
     
  3. eng45ine

    eng45ine

    May 11, 2005
    Chicago, IL
    Great burst...technology, you gotta love it!!!
     
  4. Gale

    Gale

    978
    Jan 26, 2005
    Viera Fl
    Great,

    Well I got the lens,
    But not the XXXXXX :<(((((
     
  5. cknight

    cknight

    663
    May 2, 2005
    Madison, AL
    OK, that does it. I have to get one of these lenses.
     
  6. Very well done these are great
     
  7. Jonathan

    Jonathan

    676
    Jun 11, 2005
    Southern Maine
    Wow. Great shots.
     
  8. ckdamascus

    ckdamascus

    928
    May 14, 2005
    New Jersey
    Awesome shots! Congratulations on the 70-200mm VR! I really want that lens as well but I do not think VR was the key to those shots.

    I was under the impression that VR does nothing for you at high shutter speeds. I mean there isn't much to stabilize in vibrations with high shutter speeds. If you shoot at 1/1250, you can freeze almost any human action.

    Unless I am mistaken with how VR works, I think it was the 1/1250 shutter speed that worked out there.

    The VR is supposed to help you when your hand held shaking at slow shutter speeds causes blur. i.e. shooting at 200mm you can shoot at 1/50 (or better if you have practiced your "steady hand" technique :) ) or so instead of 1/300 (1/200*1.5)

    However, the 70-200mm VR lens is SHARPER than the 80-200mm f/2.8 it replaced. (sniffles). That alone makes me want to get the 70-200mm VR. That plus you can't get a brand new AF-S super telezoom with that focal length. Puny, slow bodies like the D70 could use all the help they can get with regards to focusing!
     
  9. twig

    twig

    745
    May 23, 2005
    Carroll,

    If his pictures were taken from the deck opf a moving boat, then VR I think will help quite immensely. Even with a shutter of 1/250 his images would probably be a blurry mess without active VR, as his whole body is probably vibrating and bouncing around. I have taken shots from a slow moving ferry that look like paintings because of the motion, and he looks like he is moving a lot faster, so I think Vr really did help in this case.
     
  10. Outstanding, yet scary images. Thank goodness for life jackets. The quality is amazing. Love the 70-200!
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
60mm micro for self portrait on D2X Lens Lust May 26, 2010
D2X / 17-55 or D3 / 24-70? Lens Lust Apr 2, 2010
Mamiya 80mm f/1.9 on D2X Lens Lust Jan 20, 2010
D2X and 18-200 VR... Lens Lust Feb 15, 2006
Nikon D2X and 200-400 VR photos Lens Lust Jan 25, 2006