1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

D700 + D300 a perfect pair?

Discussion in 'Nikon FX DSLR Forum' started by jklofft, Jul 25, 2008.

  1. I just picked-up my new D700 and I can’t wait to get home from work and give it a try. I’m lovin’ the idea of shooting the D700 and D300 together. Feels like the best of both worlds. Here are a few couple of combinations (I’m sure there are others that I haven’t consider yet)

    Events - D700 w/24-70 + D300 w/85 f/1.4
    Candid Portraits - D700 w/85 f/1.4 + D300 w/70-200VR
    Travel - D700 w/70-200 + D300 w/14-24

    I’m also really hoping the rumors about new primes is true. A lens like the 24 f/1.4 would be both a 24 f/1.4 and a 35 f/1.4 how sweet is that!
     
  2. TimK

    TimK

    Apr 17, 2006
    Hong Kong, China
    Why would you want to put a tele on a FF body and a zoom on a DX?

    I would be travelling with D700 + 17-35 and D300 + 500/4 VR.
     
  3. pointa-b-c

    pointa-b-c

    452
    Mar 21, 2007
    Los Angeles
    Great lens choices for events and portraits, but for travel, shouldn't you use D700 w/ 14-24 and D300 w/ 70-200 instead? :confused: 
     
  4. IMO, the ideal travel FLs are 17-35 or 20-35 and an 80-200 or 70-200. Using the 14-24 on the D300 eliminates the need to purchase a 17-35 as the 14-24 becomes a 20-36.
     
  5. This will be my combo next year. D300 for my bird shots and the D700 for portraits.
     
  6. Eye Spy

    Eye Spy Guest

    "D700 + D300 a perfect pair? ".....First time I've heard that term refering to cameras!:wink:
     
  7. Kadath

    Kadath

    239
    Nov 21, 2007
    NJ
    --Travel - D700 w/70-200 + D300 w/14-24

    As Mr. Wonka would say "Scratch that, reverse it"
     
  8. vinman

    vinman

    Nov 15, 2006
    Upstate SC
    Ahh, so you have heard it before, then?
    :biggrin:
     
  9. Nuteshack

    Nuteshack Guest

    how bout 2 d700's ? DUH! lol
     
  10. Pete

    Pete

    Jun 10, 2006
    Denver, CO
    I am keeping my D300 also. It is great on my 300 2.8 VR and I can use the D700 for non tele lenses. Can't wait for the next air show...
    Pete
     
  11. Triggaaar

    Triggaaar

    Jun 15, 2008
    England
    I get where you're coming from Jeff. If you reversed the lenses, you'd have a (in 35mm language) huge 24 - 105mm gap. As it is, you get 21-36 & 70-200, which will cover most needs without having to change lens. And if you need to go ultra wide or ultra long, you can change lens.

    But it's not exactly a light travel option :smile:
    While I'd rather travel with an slr than a compact, I'd be happy with the D300 and 18-200vr. That's low standards for you :smile:
     
  12. PWPhoto

    PWPhoto

    581
    Jul 21, 2006
    San Diego
    agreed ;) 
     
  13. Actually the beauty is by carrying the two bodies and those two lenses you've essentially got 14-300mm covered all at f/2.8
     
  14. Perhaps, but combining with FX makes it like you've got more than one set of lenses

    14-24 or 20-30
    85 f/1.4 or 135 f/1.4
    70-200VR or 105-300VR
     
  15. I depends on the trip. To someplace really special, take the big boys. For more modest locations the D300 + 18-200. I actually own and love that combination. I call it either my P&S set-up or my Disney World set-up.
     
  16. I keep coming back to this thought process- the D300 & D700 will compliment each other so nicely.
     
  17. Triggaaar

    Triggaaar

    Jun 15, 2008
    England
    Yes indeed. If you're not a pro who needs 2 bodies just to save time switching (2 D700s sound good for a wedding photographer), the D300 and D700 do seem like a great money saving pair :biggrin:
     
  18. Tom Larsen

    Tom Larsen

    Jan 18, 2008
    Denmark
    I have the D300 and my widest lens, after I sold the D80 with the 18-200 attached, is my 24-70, the secondary lens is the 70-300 VR which I often find too long on the short end. To go wide I could buy the 14-24 to complement the 24-70, or for about $1300 more, I can buy the D700 and get wide enough for most of my needs with the 24-70 I already have, and the 70-300 would become much more useful as a walkaround lens because 70 would be just that, not 105. In addition the high ISO ability of the D700 would help in all the situations where I can't use a flash, because of reflective surfaces, or not being allowed. I think the two make a nice combo and I would keep the D300 for reach.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.