I'm sure some will take this as sour grapes, but other than FF and higher ISO than the D300, what's the big deal? It's almost the same as the D300 everywhere else in its build and function. I understand if you need FF and even better low light capability than the D300 then this is a good thing. But so many people are treating the D700 like it's revolutionary. Evolutionary yes. But not revolutionary. Am I alone on this one?