D700 w/24-120 VR package at B&H...

Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
I was just looking - yes, just looking at the D700 package at B&H for the D700 and the 24-120 VR that's for sale and noticed something really weird. It's more expensive to buy the package then if you purchase both items separately in the same order... The package price is $3599.95 - separately priced it's 3509.90 - for nearly a $100 difference in price! Is that a sneaky trick by B&H to make some extra money??? Or is it just an error on their part??

Anyone else notice this??
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
1,417
Location
NYC
Yep, I def. noticed this. It's the same with the other kits as well, not just the D700.
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
5,206
Location
Fort Leavenworth, KS
Yep, all retailers have it listed that way. Either it's a mistake on Nikon's part (MSRP) or THEY are doing it to up the sales, LOL! I really don't know what the issue is.
 
A

adrianaitken

Guest
But the D700 but itself is backordered - if you want one NOW you have to cough up the extras. Or go elsewhere !!!
 
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
3,346
Location
New Brunswick, New Jersey
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
That's not cool at all...MSRP is off! :biggrin: I never really checked other packages like this before - but since I was actually considering a d700, I decided to do the math...
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
302
Location
New Rochelle NY
My impression was the 24-120 VR was an improved or updated version. Of course if they are the exact same lens then you would be better off buying the lens separately.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
409
Location
Phoenix, Az
My impression was the 24-120 VR was an improved or updated version. Of course if they are the exact same lens then you would be better off buying the lens separately.
I looked a the kit at a local dealer last week and we opened up the box and the lens is in a standard 24-120 lens box, just included inside the larger kit box. We opened up the lens and it is the same lens that has been on the market for sevral years. He admitted that he would normally sell the items seperately for less than the kit, but he is required by Nikon to sell it at the listed price.

Bob
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
6,091
Location
Alberta
You know , somtimes I think Nikon must have monkeys working at there marketing division. Making a package of the 24-120 VR by many accounts the worst modern nikkor going? NIKON HELLO:confused:. How about slapping a "new" Nikkor 1.4 AFS on the D-700 for a hundred bucks less than the two seperatly and see how many they would sell. But the the 24-120 VR please.

Gregory
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
1,096
Location
San Jose, Ca
You know , somtimes I think Nikon must have monkeys working at there marketing division. Making a package of the 24-120 VR by many accounts the worst modern nikkor going? NIKON HELLO:confused:. How about slapping a "new" Nikkor 1.4 AFS on the D-700 for a hundred bucks less than the two seperatly and see how many they would sell. But the the 24-120 VR please.

Gregory
I think they're smarter than you think.

The kits i'm sure are sure to be selling like hotcakes, and even if they're not, they will be when the body only packages are all sold out.

Once that happens and people buy up the kits nikon is making more money AND on top of that selling a poorly designed lens with a bad reputation that doesn't sell well on it's own.

Pure freaking genius.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
6,091
Location
Alberta
Leo: You might be right:biggrin:....OO No, your wrong:tongue: attaching a POS lens to a great camera is not marketing guiness, Its bad business. Nikon has lost a huge portion of market share to Canon in the last 10 years. Putting a gun to the head and making people buy there crap(24-120) dosnt make folks want to make the switch. The fact that the D-700 is linked to one of the worst modern Nikkor's made makes me want to puke.

Gregory
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
1,096
Location
San Jose, Ca
Leo: You might be right:biggrin:....OO No, your wrong:tongue: attaching a POS lens to a great camera is not marketing guiness, Its bad business. Nikon has lost a huge portion of market share to Canon in the last 10 years. Putting a gun to the head and making people buy there crap(24-120) dosnt make folks want to make the switch. The fact that the D-700 is linked to one of the worst modern Nikkor's made makes me want to puke.

Gregory
u may be right, and i do agree with you, but nikon is making more money and clearing out it's ****** lens. lol.

genius!
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
28
Location
USA
I don't quite get this --- I really like my copy --- I have enlarged several pictures and they are "tack sharp".. I would likely agree it isn't the sharpest wide open, but as a travel lens... no complaints...


You know , somtimes I think Nikon must have monkeys working at there marketing division. Making a package of the 24-120 VR by many accounts the worst modern nikkor going? NIKON HELLO:confused:. How about slapping a "new" Nikkor 1.4 AFS on the D-700 for a hundred bucks less than the two seperatly and see how many they would sell. But the the 24-120 VR please.

Gregory
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
6,091
Location
Alberta
Leo: Cool. Im glad we are both laughing. The fact is my D-700 just got drained for a Nikkor 8 2.8 AIS fish-eye from keh:biggrin:
So Im a little giddy. Im happy with My D3 and two F4s. The D-700 with its crappy lens is going to have to wait:smile:

Gregory
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
6,091
Location
Alberta
Bruce: Im not really dumping on the zoom kit lens(24-120 VR) that Nikon is "pushing" with the D-700. And Im sure if I had a good sample I could make that baby sing. And Im sure yours is great and Im sure your captures are top notch. Its just I wanted to see the D-700 with a new 50 1.4 AFS. I own almost 20 Nikkor's and not one AF. If nikon can get me to switch to AF, they can get anybody. But for now, Im Nikkor AIS all the way.

Gregory
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
28
Location
USA
Ah... AIS... OK say no more, of course (from what I have seen and hear) there is no comparison to AIS lens... and I guess I should have mentioned most of this shooting was using a DX camera (D70) -- so I probably should run a few shots through my D700 before commenting (atleast on the edge performance).. having said that, it just seemed like a lot of bad press for a lens that has for me anyway served its $500 (or whatever I paid when it came out) price tag several times over... (3 trips to India and many others).

I guess if there really is a problem with these 24-120's in general, I should not be told about it.. otherwise that is what causes lens lust isn't it?

Bruce: ....... But for now, Im Nikkor AIS all the way.

Gregory
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom