Decisions Decisions

Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
633
So now what do we do? I must say that this D700 is tempting.

For those who already made the jump to the D3, what are you using to cover the wide end?

I already own a 24-70, I know most would say that the 14-24 is a no brainer...but I'm not sure about the whole no filter thing. That is a tough. Especially for sea scapes.

Thoughts?
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
10,688
Location
Holyoke, MA USA
So now what do we do? I must say that this D700 is tempting.

For those who already made the jump to the D3, what are you using to cover the wide end?

I already own a 24-70, I know most would say that the 14-24 is a no brainer...but I'm not sure about the whole no filter thing. That is a tough. Especially for sea scapes.

Thoughts?

Are you aware that the 12-24mm is wholly FX compatible from 18mm-24mm? That might be a good option. On a FF camera, that is a truly wide angle even if not quite as wide as 14mm. But then you don't have the bulging front element as well.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
1,628
Location
RV on the road
24 is wide enough for a lot of situations on FX, but I use a 17-35/2.8 Nikkor a good bit and it's wonderful to my eye on the D3 (and takes filters).
 
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
633
Are you aware that the 12-24mm is wholly FX compatible from 18mm-24mm? That might be a good option. On a FF camera, that is a truly wide angle even if not quite as wide as 14mm. But then you don't have the bulging front element as well.

I had no idea about that. 18mm on FX is more then enough, I guess that would be the equivalent of 12mm on DX. Looks like I could wait things out.

I'd like to wait to see how Zeiss's new offering is also but that wont be for a few months.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
26,905
Location
Clearwater, Florida
So now what do we do? I must say that this D700 is tempting.

For those who already made the jump to the D3, what are you using to cover the wide end?

I already own a 24-70, I know most would say that the 14-24 is a no brainer...but I'm not sure about the whole no filter thing. That is a tough. Especially for sea scapes.

Thoughts?

the 14-24 has such impeccable glass
the NO FILTER thing... i can see your point, if you wanted a polarizer
the sigma 10-20 is a well-thought of lens.... will work well on an FX camera

i think you can use a filter on it... not sure
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2007
Messages
667
Location
River Forest, Illinois
the sigma 10-20 is a well-thought of lens.... will work well on an FX camera

i think you can use a filter on it... not sure

The Sig 10-20 is a DC lens, meaning it was designed for DX cameras. Is there a focal length this will work for FX cameras?
 

Latest threads

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Forum GIFs powered by GIPHY: https://giphy.com/
Copyright © Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom