Dress for Success: Gear Poll

Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
Borrowing a line from George Goebel,

Sometimes I feel like the Nikon Cafe is a tuxedo, and I'm a pair of brown shoes :?.

My long reach kit consists of the d70, Nikon 80-200AFD, and Kenko Pro 1.4x teleconverter. It seems like everybody else has a
d2h, 300 f/4, and Nikon TC14e... at a minimum. It's giving me a horrible case of simultaneous lens and body lust.

How about a poll... "what's your long reach kit?" The results will either cure me, or send me to the Nikon Hospital.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
1,027
Location
Annandale, VA
UncleFrank said:
How about a poll... "what's your long reach kit?" The results will either cure me, or send me to the Nikon Hospital.

70-200VR with a TCEII. I don't mind the softness. But I am getting twinges about that 400mm over in the for sale forum.

Rich :lol:
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
I know what you mean, Rich. That 300/4 on the sales forum is driving me crazy :? . It was very cruel of Patrick to set up that forum;
it's just a breeding ground for Lens Lust Disease.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
1,000
Location
Arizona
Real Name
Chris
An old Vivitar 400mm f/5.6 with manual focusing and 'preset type' aperture ring (2 of 'em, one for shooting, the other for setting.) But it does have 19 blades and is quite sharp at f/11, supersharp at f/16, and it goes all the way to f/45.

But manual exposure on a d100!?!?!!! Not to mention manual focusing, with nearly a 360 degree throw. I can forget about following anything that's moving, and it ain't that fast, so it sits here and I photograph closer stuff.

I'm feelin' like a pair of tennis shoes with a hole, to borrow Frank's Goebel similie.
 

gho

Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
2,556
Location
California
UncleFrank said:
Sometimes I feel like the Nikon Cafe is a tuxedo, and I'm a pair of brown shoes :?
If you're a pair of brown shoes, then I must be flip flops cuz the longest I have is my 80-200 NO TC.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
1,969
Location
Tennessee
70-200 and what should be a TC-17. I ordered and paid for the TC Jan 12, but the shippment got lost in the mail. I have to wait until this coming Monday to fill out insurance paperwork with B&H so they will reship my order. That is if they have anything left after the fire.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
4,084
UncleFrank said:
How about a poll... "what's your long reach kit?" The results will either cure me, or send me to the Nikon Hospital.

Frank :


Heh. Well...

D100 (no D2H), 70-200mm AFS/VR, 200-400 AFS/VR, TC14EII, TC17EII


John P.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
2,296
Location
Ohio & Florida
If it makes anyone feel better our long kit is a D-100 with a 28-200G and a D-70 with a 70-300ED. I was kind of embarrassed at the Merritt Island shoot.

I have a 500 full manual f8 Mirror which is really soft. Also a 1200 spotting scope that I can attach the D-100 to but it is really hard to see to focus in viewfinder at F11.

Bob
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
8,712
Location
Maple Bay, Duncan, BC, Canada
Real Name
Andreas Berglund
D2H soon to be D2X with a Sigma 800 5.6 and a 80-400 VR. I have not had luck with the TC14EII

From the Sigma today
40161471.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


UncleFrank said:
Borrowing a line from George Goebel,

Sometimes I feel like the Nikon Cafe is a tuxedo, and I'm a pair of brown shoes :?.

My long reach kit consists of the d70, Nikon 80-200AFD, and Kenko Pro 1.4x teleconverter. It seems like everybody else has a
d2h, 300 f/4, and Nikon TC14e... at a minimum. It's giving me a horrible case of simultaneous lens and body lust.

How about a poll... "what's your long reach kit?" The results will either cure me, or send me to the Nikon Hospital.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
34,172
Location
St. George, Utah
D2H with 300mm f2.8 EDIF lens plus TC1.4e and this does not seem long enough when shooting birds. I guess that is why I don't shoot all that many birds.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
994
Location
Alabama
greyflash said:
D2H with 300mm f2.8 EDIF lens plus TC1.4e and this does not seem long enough when shooting birds. I guess that is why I don't shoot all that many birds.

Actually Gordon, this is my favorite set-up for shooting flying birds. Just long enough, but not so long that it cuts their wings off.... :lol:

Frank
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
15,253
Location
Marysville, WA
Well, now....here is my current set-up.

Camera 1, Mr. Primary:

D2H
Sigma 500mm f4.5 HSM
Nikon TC-14E 1.4 - nominal 700mm f6.alittlebit, AF's very fast, my "prime" set up.
With the Nikon TC-20E, 2.0 - nominal 1000mm, f9, AF sucks, but for stationary objects works well
Stack both TC's for 1400mm, f-waytoomuch, forget AF, danged if it doesn't work well, I got a "lucky" pair

Camera 2, when 500 is "too much"

D70
Sigma 120-300 f2.8 HSM
Sigma 1.4x TC for 240-600 f4
Just got this but am liking it, will take it out for a real "test drive" tomorrow morning, but the darned clouds are back, which sucks....
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
4,741
Location
SE Florida
You can never have too much hair, money, or focal length

Frank, I think you need a 300 f4 :D The magnification of a 200 just isn't enough to fill the frame for most birdies... unless they're trained, of course, like your hummers ;) I will say I've had some luck shooting larger birds with my 70-200+TC 1.4, which reaches out to 280mm.
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom