Eastern Washington with Chip and the Redtails

Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
15,253
Location
Marysville, WA
"Chip and the Redtails", ought to be some sort of musical group, eh?
:biggrin:

These were a real bonus and a surprise for me, I sure am glad that Chip spotted them when he did.

As I was processing these, I noticed what I thought were some intersting color casts from the light filtration and direction, I would like to know what you think, if anything looks just a touch "off".

Thanks,

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Oct 13, 2005
Messages
460
Location
WA
I like "Barney and the ticks" better.:biggrin:


Ahh the hawks. Nice job. The third with the mouth open turned out great eh?

I have a green cast to the underneath side of the wings too. I believe its the grass and trees reflecting back under the wings. Being we were so close to them and they were so close to the ground and trees, me thinks that is what it is.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
332
Location
LA
I think I can help you with this one ---having shot with Chip it was more than likely his refection green with envy :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
540
Location
Pacific NW
Washington - where moss even grows on the birds! :biggrin:

Nice shots Bill, amazing lens too - 950mm? How do you manage to capture these birds off a tripod, or do you use something else to support it?
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
15,253
Location
Marysville, WA
A second rendition of one image

Washington - where moss even grows on the birds! :biggrin:

Nice shots Bill, amazing lens too - 950mm? How do you manage to capture these birds off a tripod, or do you use something else to support it?
Well, I have explained this over and over again, but just for you I'll do it again :wink: :wink:, this is called Nikon Math, pay close attention:

These were shot with the 400mm f2.8 plus a 1.7 TC. As we all know, the TC multiplies based on the same Math we were all taught and reports such to EXIF, correct?

So:
400 * 1.4 = 560 f4
400 * 1.7 = 680 f4.8
400 * 2.0 = 800 f5.6
400 * 1.4 * 2.0 = 1120 f8

All the above combos will also auto-focus, stacking requires a slight mod to the TC's. Oh, wait, you don't see 950 anywhere in there you say???? Hmmmm, more Nikon Math, in order of timeline when they were made, sorry I don't know the years.

TC-14E
TC-20E
400mm f2.8 AFS-I
TC-17E
400mm F2.8 AFS-II

Nikon, in their infinite wisdom, has told me they have no intention of upgrading the firmware in the AFS-I version of the 400 f2.8 so that 400 *1.7 = 680 rather than 950. If you can figure out how they get 950, I'll buy you a cup of coffee, or a beer, or even a shot of Single-Malt :biggrin:

The good news in all this is that metering is correct, and somehow so is the F-stop. Weird, eh?

G.R..E..E..N Cast Bill :>)))))

Beautiful shots
Gale, see Chip's comments as well, looks like it was reflection and filtered light. Here is a second rendition of one of them, does it look better?

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Thanks, all.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
5,355
Location
Placitas, New Mexico
Wow! That last shot is quite dramatic. I have version I of the 400 2.8, and it too records 950mm with the 1.7. I just figured it was an extra boost Nikon built in but didn't tell us about.

The yellow/green hue is distracting, even if it is natural. Otherwise this is a great series.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom