F5 versus Leica

Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
5,231
Location
USA
Well.....not really....different films etc.... but here's an example of an image taken with an F5 and Kodak 400 film and an image taken with a Leica M7 and Fujifilm. No point really....just thought someone might be interested.

F5 with Kodak Portra 400VC:
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Leica M7 with Fujifilm Pro 400H:
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
1,082
Location
north of S.F. bay
the second shot has a smoothness, and i prefer it by a large margin over the first shot...perhaps it is the difference in lenses, not the camera body
 
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
5,231
Location
USA
the second shot has a smoothness, and i prefer it by a large margin over the first shot...perhaps it is the difference in lenses, not the camera body
I think it's probably a combination of the lens and the film.

The F5 shot was taken with a Nikkor 85 1.4
The Leica shot with the Summicron 35 2.0

I think the F5 / Kodak shot has a decidedly....Kodak feel to it so I'm not ruling that out as a major factor in the difference in overall look and feel.
 
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
5,231
Location
USA
In the F5's defense, it feels like a pistol going off when you fire it.
Funny you should say that. I have said many times that you don't release the shutter of an F5 you pull the trigger. You are absolutely spot on with that comment. The tactile feel of pulling the trigger of an F5 is one of the main reasons it is such a near and dear camera for me.
 
M

matthew.paul

Guest
Well, I prefer Fuji's color films anyways, but it does have a smoothness about it, which I am sure is part film, part lens.

Anyways, both are great shots!
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
2,053
Location
Wood-Ridge, NJ
Here is some fuji color for you.....

GenoP

Nikon F3 HP ,Nikkor 45mm f/2.8P ,Fujicolor NPH 400
f8
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
M

matthew.paul

Guest
Man, Geno! I bet that 45mm and F3 make a great compact combo!

hmmm...might need to get one for my F3

Oh, yes, nice colors. I've consistently been more impressed with fuji colors over Kodak, etc.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
2,053
Location
Wood-Ridge, NJ
Man, Geno! I bet that 45mm and F3 make a great compact combo!

hmmm...might need to get one for my F3

Oh, yes, nice colors. I've consistently been more impressed with fuji colors over Kodak, etc.
Unfortunately, the F3 is gone.....Randy Forshey now owns it. I would actually love to sell the F5 and get another one, or an FM3.

GenoP
 
B

BigPixel

Guest
wow Stu. I really l;ike the depth and contrast of the F5/Kodak save for the extremely dark shadow under Sam's eyes. I know that's just a lighting issue and could easily be fixed....Thank God we live oin a digital age!
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
230
Location
Manchesterford, UK
Oh, yes, nice colors. I've consistently been more impressed with fuji colors over Kodak, etc.
With the caveat that I don't use pro emulsions, and that this is all a terribly unscientific personal impression, I always think of Kodak as having the best blue, Fuji the best green, and Agfa (R.I.P.) as the best red.

Kodak (Kodacolor VR Plus 200, Canonet QL19)



Fuji (Superia 400, Nikon F90x + Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 AF-N)



Agfa (Vista 200, Canonet QL19 GIII)

 
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
230
Location
Manchesterford, UK
Of the two shots, I like the second best, but more because of composition, I think. Both are great, and I'd be turning handsprings had I shot anything half as good with any of my cameras.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
35,322
Location
Arizona
Real Name
Chris
Pretty shots Stuart!

The Fuji 400 shot is fine, but the shadows in the Portra pic seem blocked.
Have you tried Portra NC for skin shots? I much prefer its rendition to the VC which looks harsh and overly contrasty by comparison. Some people find NC's colors unstaurated, but it doesn't bother me.
 
R

Removed User 2

Guest
Good shots. I like the film look of both! But the Kodak looks like it's from a cheap Costco scan (well, both look like that, but the Kodak even more). I wouldn't judge Kodak on this picture alone...

Since the light is different on both shots, I bet anything you want that the Fuji film wouldn't have looked much different then the Kodak.
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
114
Location
Los Angeles
I am partial to the first. Something about it has more grit.

Both are great....

But doesn't Leica kill a kitten for every shutter click?
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom