Flower from Today

Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
1,315
Location
Gaylord, Michigan
Shot this today in the garden. D2X w/105 micro at f8

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
33,092
Location
St. George, Utah
Thanks for sharing this image. I feel that it could be even better with a little processing. Hope you don't mind me manipulating it a bit. I sharpened it a bit and then increased the contrast and gave it a little color boost.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
1,315
Location
Gaylord, Michigan
Looks good Gordon. I always lean towards undersharpening because I don't want to over sharpen. I'm still learning PS. How did you boost the color? It looks closer to the actual flower that what I got.

Thanks again,
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
33,092
Location
St. George, Utah
Generally you can just increase the contrast slightly and it gives you a brighter and more colorful image. Of course that is providing it isn't already a contrasty image. I also tweaked it a bit with a Velvia plug in from Fred Miranda.
 
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
3,925
Location
Owings Mills, MD
I like both images (soft and sharpened). Now comes the $64,000.00 question, what is it? I saw one in the resident garden at work last week but couldn't identify it.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2005
Messages
3,624
Location
Vienna, AUSTRIA
greyflash said:
Thanks for sharing this image. I feel that it could be even better with a little processing. Hope you don't mind me manipulating it a bit. I sharpened it a bit and then increased the contrast and gave it a little color boost.
Gordon. I agree that the pic could do with a bit of sharpening, but doing so on the small web version is somewhat problematic. Have you recognized how your sharpening has pronounced the jpg artifacts? Looks like you just used USM a bit too extensively. An edge sparpening technique might have prevented that.

regards
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2005
Messages
3,624
Location
Vienna, AUSTRIA
Harry S. said:
greyflash said:
Thanks for sharing this image. I feel that it could be even better with a little processing. Hope you don't mind me manipulating it a bit. I sharpened it a bit and then increased the contrast and gave it a little color boost.
Gordon. I agree that the pic could do with a bit of sharpening, but doing so on the small web version is somewhat problematic. Have you recognized how your sharpening has pronounced the jpg artifacts? Looks like you just used USM a bit too extensively. An edge sparpening technique might have prevented that.

regards
I just had a look at the original image at Scott's Pbase gallery. It looks much better there.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
33,092
Location
St. George, Utah
Harry S. said:
greyflash said:
Thanks for sharing this image. I feel that it could be even better with a little processing. Hope you don't mind me manipulating it a bit. I sharpened it a bit and then increased the contrast and gave it a little color boost.
Gordon. I agree that the pic could do with a bit of sharpening, but doing so on the small web version is somewhat problematic. Have you recognized how your sharpening has pronounced the jpg artifacts? Looks like you just used USM a bit too extensively. An edge sparpening technique might have prevented that.

regards
Your right but as you say I was working from the posted jpeg version. I probaly shouldn't have sharpened it at all since what I was really trying to demonstrate was using contrast to enhance the colors some.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom