The thing that bothers me about the Sony is the OOF areas. So, given the right circumstances that might not be a problem. The second shot appears a bit crunchy(sharpening halos?) on my monitor. Over all, I would pick the first for those reasons.
Hard for me to compare accurately—2 different scenes, #1 is a wee bit over exposed (blown out highlights on the bird's back) and has narrower dof; #2 has better exposure and light, and is over sharpened, and has a less competing background.