Help..once again..lenses

Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
498
Location
riyadh
In a previous post I had requested for primes to carry on an arctic
vacation. Thank you so much for your responses.

I need your help once again: Just a preamble before the question.

1. D200 bit the dust
2. D80 has intermittent battery issues.
3. D70s, nikon here cannot clean a filthy sensor.
4. my granddaughter left key marks on my 20/2.8
5. my 35/2 has oil in the blades ( 3 copy..oooovvvverexposes )

Good news, the vacation is back on track. Loaner D200 has become available and the d80 can act as a b/u.
Seems my zooms have to be put in service.

Suggestions invited for:
12-24 or 17-35 or 17-55?
85/1.4 or 105/2.8 vr or 70-200 ( ouch !! )?
28/1.4 or 50/1.4?

or 18-200? and be done with it. This is a photog vacation.

Please, please don't pair the 17-55 with the 70-200, I cannot manage.
Are 2 camera bodies necessary?
plan is visit sweden, arctic circle, cruise down west coast of norway.

Grateful for your advise. I am going nuts!!
 
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
931
Location
Home: Columbia, MD, USA; Present: Bogota, Colombia
When my wife and I were in Norway, it was pre-digital. I only had one body (Olympus OM-1) and I only had 28, 50, 100, and a 90mm Macro. I managed just fine. You will to with whatever you take. That aside I would probably want the 17-35 and the 70-200 if I were going today.

Good luck
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
498
Location
riyadh
When my wife and I were in Norway, it was pre-digital. I only had one body (Olympus OM-1) and I only had 28, 50, 100, and a 90mm Macro. I managed just fine. You will to with whatever you take. That aside I would probably want the 17-35 and the 70-200 if I were going today.

Good luck
Thanks Scott. I am tending towards the 17-35 myself. The 70-200mm, well I am a small old man with a stent to worry about!!

best.
 
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
931
Location
Home: Columbia, MD, USA; Present: Bogota, Colombia
In that case you may want to consider the 70-300 VR. It seams like a good quality (non-professional) lens which is very small and lightweight. I haven't shot with the lens but I did try one on my camera about a week ago. It is not a fast lens but the images I have seen from it appear to be quite good. And it much less costly.

Just a thought.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom