Help with fogged lens picture

Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
23,127
Location
SW Virginia
My wife got a snapshot today of my grandson catching his first fish - a moment to remember. Unfortunately, she had just come from an air-conditioned house into the heat of midafternoon in Alabama, and the lens was apparently fogged. The image looks overexposed, but I'm sure it was just fog on the lens.

My question is, can the image be saved in Photoshop? I know you can't create data where there is none, but what is the best way to maximize what we do have?

She was using our little Nikon 4300, so it is a 4MP jpeg.

I'm ashamed to post the picture - it's that bad.

Any suggestions?
 
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
928
Location
New Jersey
If you have Nikon Capture or the free Nikon View, you can try to see if the auto color and auto contrast can fix it a bit.

It should still work on JPEGs.
 
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
Pa,
We all make mistakes and sometimes the only recourse is PP. I'm with Chris -- post the image and let us see what we can do. You just might be responsible for adding another tool to the toolbox. [When life gives you lemons......]
 
M

marc

Guest
pa

probably not, if blurry fogged, really poor

nc and acr can fix only what is already there

sorry
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
1,311
Pa said:
My wife got a snapshot today of my grandson catching his first fish - a moment to remember. Unfortunately, she had just come from an air-conditioned house into the heat of midafternoon in Alabama, and the lens was apparently fogged. The image looks overexposed, but I'm sure it was just fog on the lens.

My question is, can the image be saved in Photoshop? I know you can't create data where there is none, but what is the best way to maximize what we do have?

She was using our little Nikon 4300, so it is a 4MP jpeg.

I'm ashamed to post the picture - it's that bad.

Any suggestions?

I live in FL and the solution to the foggy lens deal for me is using an insulated cooler bag for camera and lenses. It solves my problem.
 
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
23,127
Location
SW Virginia
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
Please forgive my slow response to all your kind suggestions, but I've been in the backwoods of central Alabama for the last few days at a family reunion (will post some pictures later), with no internet access.

Here is the picture. I warned you it was bad!

Thanks for looking!

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
12,615
Location
Pleasantville Ohio
Pa,
A couple of applications of the local contrast enhancement technique suggested by Paul will help considerably. After that, you might want to try using a mask to selectively adjust saturation and brightness levels. This should bring the image "out of the fog". You should be able to do much better with the original image -- the 72dpi one that you posted begins to lose out for lack of information at this point. I don't know what you might be able to do with the faces -- it'd be nice to get the expression on the boy's face. [I remember my granddaughter's first fish better than she does.]
Next time......

Forgot to mention that Paul's settings are good for light haze, but this image requires a more aggressive approach -- I set the amount for 100% and still had to repeat the process. (If you have problems and want me to try with the original, email it to me.)
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
4,437
Location
Denver, Pennsylvania, uSA
Pa:

I know that I am no expert but I got the best results from changing it to greyscale and adjusting the contrast, brightness, and playing with the histogram.
 

Commodorefirst

Admin/Moderator
Administrator
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
21,461
Location
Missouri
Pa said:
Please forgive my slow response to all your kind suggestions, but I've been in the backwoods of central Alabama for the last few days at a family reunion (will post some pictures later), with no internet access.

Here is the picture. I warned you it was bad!

Thanks for looking!

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
here is my attempt, and this a quick and dirty haze removal, and I didn't spend time cleaning up the sky or area around the subjects. found this to look best in a quadtone greyscale.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
1,827
Location
Israel
Real Name
Heiko
Hi Pa,

This is my quick and dirty try. I used NC and adjusted curves to get more contrast (moved the left slider to the right where the histogram starts, and the right to the left to enhance highlights). Then I used "Photo Effects" Auto button, with enhance dark tone on. Afterwards I moved the mid slider on the curves to +30 to brighten the midtones, which were very dark after the Photo Effects adjustment.
Next step I used NeatImage to clean up some of the noise and haze (there are probably better filters than the one I used).

If the original is a RAW file, you can do much better. Also, within PS you would be able to remove the color casts around yourself and the boy and enhance the faces individually (I don't have PS on my laptop, where I'm sitting at).

Hope it gives some useful clues. And here the results:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
1,113
Location
Tucson, AZ U.S.A.
here's a try

I know you've already had a bunch of suggestions, but I thought I'd throw in my own too. Here's what I came up with:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


I didn't spend too much time tweaking it. I just wanted to see if it could be saved. I switched to lab color and tweaked the levels for the lightness field. Then I switched back to rgb and ran an overall unsharp mask with a ridiculous radius for an overal contrast fix. The right hand side still looks a little hazy because I threw a gradient in there, but I guess it wasn't really needed/helpfull. You can obviously see the compression artifacts after all of this manipulation, but I'm sure the results will be much more pleasing when working on the original. Good luck. I'm sure we'd all like to see how it comes out in the end.

Dave
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
3,497
Location
South SF Bay Area, CA.
Hi Pa,

If you have PS, you could try increasing the density first but creating a duplicate layer (Ctrl-J) and changing the blending mode from "Normal" to "Multiply". Then apply all the other techniques (haze removal with large radius USM, noise removal, adjusting levels, curves, etc...)
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom