1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

If you could only have 2 lens in you bag ?

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by joepilot, Jun 6, 2007.

  1. joepilot


    Mar 21, 2007
    Richmond Va.
    After reading the pro's and con's of many hunks of glass . What would be most desired two lens to put in your bag . I just canceled and order for a 18-200vr.
  2. DBrim


    May 30, 2007
    Boston, MA
    I don't own either (yet!), but I have played with both and am very impressed.
    Tokina 12-24/4 (Nikon if cost wasn't an issue)

    That would give me the versatility I desire and a decent lens for wide-angle shots. I do a lot of landscapes, so the wide-angle is important. The 18-200 is just for coverage.
  3. cali-kid


    May 26, 2007
    Houston, Texas
    I recieved my 17-55 2.8 today. I will test drive it soon. I own the 18-200 vr and will sell it soon. I will aquire the 70-200 2.8 vr to replace it.

    Only two lenses: 17-55 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 vr

  4. joepilot


    Mar 21, 2007
    Richmond Va.
    Dbrim thanks I do a lot wake board ,drag, landscape, and people shots. I have a D80 18-135 and 70-300vr but looking for better glass
  5. joepilot


    Mar 21, 2007
    Richmond Va.
    Chris I do like the looks of the 70-200 and 17-55 and these are the 2 that I want .BUT ONLY 1 can be bought know
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 6, 2007
  6. jcovert

    jcovert Guest


    It would be a BIG bag.:biggrin:
  7. 85/1.4

  8. eng45ine


    May 11, 2005
    Chicago, IL
    Only two lenses, that's easy...70-200mm f/2.8 and 400mm f/2.8
  9. Muonic


    Jun 14, 2006
    28-70 and 80-200.
  10. Jeff Lee

    Jeff Lee

    May 16, 2006
    Hmmm, 12-24 & 600mm.

    Out of what I have (and can afford), the 12-24 and the 300 with TCS & Canon 500D. 65% of my shots are already with these two.
  11. TC17EII and the 400mm F2.8 AF-S II :cool: 
  12. joepilot


    Mar 21, 2007
    Richmond Va.
    Interesting most choose from 12 to 70 then a long lens But Frank you picked 2 long lens ?
  13. photoshooter

    photoshooter Guest

    It depends on what you shoot most

    17-55, 70-200 if you need short to medium length, fast glass

    70-200, 200-400 + tc1.4, if you need long , sports etc.
  14. I make this decision almost every day . . .

    . . . unless I have something specific I'm going to shoot I look over my couple of dozen lenses and usually end up taking the 28/2 and . . . something longer. Lately something longer has been the 75-150/3.5.

    But then again, I'm an odd bird that way.

  15. ultimind


    May 13, 2007
    Cleveland, OH
    My gaggle of lenses is fairly lower end stuff... and when I take minimum lenses with me, I bring the 18-70 F3.5-4.5 and 70-210 F4-5.6. In an ideal world, I'd take a Sigma 24-70 F2.8 and Sigma 70-200 F2.8. This is a 3rd party cheap solution to the 17-55 F2.8 and 80-200 AF-D (or AF-S or VR)
  16. Defiantly the 70-200VR, and probably 300 2.8 (and the TCs if I could get away with it).


    70-200VR (and TCs) and something wider like the 17-55.
  17. Snap.... David, just my answer as well... 28-70 & 80-200, but I would add the 12-24 for a 3 lens set, and thats got it all covered for me....
  18. 17-55mm and 180/2.8
  19. 17-55 and 70-200
    17-55 and Sig 150 macro
    18-200VR and Sig 10-20
    50 1.4 and 85 1.4

    Really depends on what I want to shoot that day.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.