Is a 3rd party sharpner really worth it ?

Discussion in 'Retouching and Post Processing' started by Cream, Mar 28, 2007.

  1. Cream

    Cream

    115
    Mar 18, 2006
    Bournemouth, UK
    People will probably disagree with me, but I have been having a hard time telling the difference between Nikon Capture NX and Focal Blade in respect to the sharpening.
    I have sharpened in the raw editor and saved to JPG, I have then used an unsharpened JPG and applied Focal Blade to the image.
    Looking at the two images side by side, at 100%, 200% and 300% I cannot see anything different in using the standard settings.
    When I go into the expert mode of focal blade, and play around with the various sliders, I can see a difference, but to my eye I am not sure if the image is then oversharpened ! Matter of opinion I suppose
    I think what I am really after is people's opinions, for settings, other 3rd party applications and at the end of the day is there a significant difference in the final print????
    I use Qimage, which can sharpen, I assume that this should be switched off ????? Or should I just use Qimage to sharpen my images ? If So which setting ???
    So many questions !!
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
3rd Annual Nikon Cafe Get-Together Retouching and Post Processing Jan 31, 2007
Also at the party - Tommy Retouching and Post Processing Mar 14, 2006