Ken Rockwell D200 Review

Discussion in 'Nikon DX DSLR' started by petert053, Dec 3, 2005.

  1. petert053

    petert053

    143
    Nov 19, 2005
    Austin, TX
  2. JeffKohn

    JeffKohn

    Apr 21, 2005
    Houston, TX
    If you can call that a review...
     
  3. petert053

    petert053

    143
    Nov 19, 2005
    Austin, TX
    Yes... "review" was being overly generous... "commentary" is probably better...
     
  4. Even when he's not a "reviewer" he's an entertainer.
    Getting his share of controversy gets him more than his share of hits.
    I suspect he reads this. I suspect he smiles.

    Like most of the internet...you get what you pay for, or more....never do you get less than nothing when you pay nothing. :wink:
     
  5. Peter took my words. LOL 45921555.
     
  6. :Teeth: :Crunk: :Crunk: :Crunk: :Crunk: :Crunk:
     
  7. I agree with Ken that the size of the D2X is a disadvantage. But D2X image quality is noticeably better from what I've seen. I shoot other formats and prefer the small size of the D70s, because I sometimes carry my GX-617 pano outfit or Mamiya 7II. I'll upgrade to the D200 as a reasonable compromise between D70s and D2X.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Ken Rockwell and the rest of you owe me $420.00! Nikon DX DSLR Feb 21, 2011
D3100 High Iso comparisons on Ken Rockwell Nikon DX DSLR Sep 29, 2010
Ken Rockwell Nikon DX DSLR Oct 6, 2008
D90 Review at Ken Rockwell Nikon DX DSLR Sep 22, 2008
Ken Rockwell reviews the D90 Nikon DX DSLR Aug 27, 2008