In my college professor days I taught a business class on internet research. Yes, we all know how to use a search engine...to a point. My students were often amazed at how I could fine better results they could. Part of the class involved doing background work on the information provider. Were they knowledgeable, did they have an agenda or bias that slanted their views, etc. One of the areas where one needs to pay attention is when reading product reviews on the internet. As many here have seen KR does have a tendency to be overly positive on some items. But then I bet we all can also recall reviewers who trash things we know are actually good products. I have read many reviews done by KR. In doing so with a critical eye I have learned to look through the surface of what he says and "translate" his comments. Its clear that he has some personal biases and that he has been known to overly hype some of his favorite items. But, if one reads between the lines you can sift out a lot of good information from a lot of things he has written. The man does know a lot, the reader just has to be able to sort through the information at times to get to the bottom of things. It is fun, and I can point to specific examples (and I bet you can to) where where he will trash a certain item in one article and another time will speak favorable about the same item in another piece.
I don't mind reading Ken's stuff, there is a lot of knowledge and history posted by him. Do I follow all his recommendations? Well, no, and neither should you. I always like to read several reviews by various "experts" before drawing any conclusions. Of course there are some reviewers on "youtubers" and such that I only look at when I want a laugh. I bet you know who they are also.
