I have been reading the reviews and opinions on these two Nikon lenses: 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF and the 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR. I may be missing something, but I didn't see my questions answered. I believe that I have narrowed my next lens down to one of these guys. Aside from the VR advantage, will one of these lenses give a sharper image than the other? I want to use it as my main walk-around lens. I can see the advantage of 200mm for the birds at my feeders and I can see the advantage of lower shutter speeds while hand-held with the VR. I believe that the baby VR will focus faster as well. Aside from the $200 difference, is there any other difference? Is there anything else that you guys would recommend from Nikon or anyone else? By the way, I will be using it on my D70 which is typically used in P mode and RAW+JPEG. Thanks.