Lily - Follow up

Discussion in 'Macro, Flowers, Insects, and Greenery' started by Flew, Jul 11, 2005.

  1. Flew

    Flew

    994
    Jan 25, 2005
    Alabama
    I ran outside this morning and took a few shots with the 70-200VR + 500D. It's pretty cloudy, but I wanted to take a few comparison shots. I think that the kit lens held up pretty well. The 70-200VR bokeh and overall sharpness may be a tad better, but the kit lens did OK IMHO. Here are the 70-200VR shots.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The original 18-70 shots are below.

    Janie and I have been working hard on our new yard the last month, keeping me from getting out to shoot. Sunday we brought home a beautiful lily. I had my kit lens (18-70) on the D2H, and I was so covered with dirt, grit, and mud, that I didn't want to take a chance of changing lenses. Since we were racing the hurricane, I didn't even take the time to get out the tripod.

    In any case, these aren't quite as sharp as they would have been with the 70-200VR and 500D, but they are awfully pretty.

    Front view:
    [​IMG]

    Side view:
    [​IMG]

    Closer:
    [​IMG]

    Real close:
    [​IMG]

    I can't wait for this storm to pass through so I can get at this beauty with my 70-200VR. :wink:
     
  2. Re: Lily

    And you ain't just whistlin Dixie! Very intense colors!!

    Hopefully you'll not get too doused by Dennis. We were spared.
     
  3. Leigh

    Leigh

    Feb 19, 2005
    Alabama
    Does it smell as pretty as it looks? That's pretty sharp...but I think you were wise to not change lenses if you were covered in dirt and grime....Can't wait to see what you do w/the 70-200VR!!
     
  4. Flew

    Flew

    994
    Jan 25, 2005
    Alabama
    Thanks guys (and gals....;-)).

    Leigh, I love your new avatar. 8)

    Oh, yeah, it does smell wonderful.
     
  5. Frank,

    Those are lovely! The detail is amazing.
     
  6. Flew

    Flew

    994
    Jan 25, 2005
    Alabama
    Crystall,

    Not nearly as sharp as they would have been with the 70-180. 8)

    You really have me intrigued with that lens, and of course ol' Dave has me thinking about the 200 micro too. Which would you recommend if you had the choice?

    Thanks,
     
  7. PGB

    PGB

    Jan 25, 2005
    You have got to be kidding Frank. These were with the 18-70???? Excellent detail!

    Thanks,
     
  8. Flew

    Flew

    994
    Jan 25, 2005
    Alabama
    Patrick,

    Yeah, not bad for $300. 8)

    Are you and Leigh playing musical chairs at the computer tonight? :lol:
     
  9. Wonderfully sharp images Frank. If your yard is as pretty as your images you have a real showplace.
     
  10. Flew

    Flew

    994
    Jan 25, 2005
    Alabama
    Thanks Gordon. We've certainly worked hard on it. Just got new Bermuda sod and a sprinkler system, so we are working hard on the flowers, to make it worth all the $$ we spent. :roll:

    Of course (don't tell Janie), I keep thinking of all the nice glass I could have bought. :lol:
     
  11. Jerry Snider

    Jerry Snider

    390
    May 8, 2005
    Excellent images, Frank. I especially like 1 and 4, but all are very good.
    Jerry Snider
     
  12. Gale

    Gale

    978
    Jan 26, 2005
    Viera Fl
    Look like a star gazer lily. They are gorgeous.
     
  13. Frank i like them all they are so sharp and the colors so smooth.
     
  14. Frank,

    Nice and sharp, lots of color. On my monitor, the 70-200 images seem a bit more saturated as well - but that may be due to a change in the lighting conditions.

    How did you make out in hurricane Dennis? Hopefully no damage or my name will be mud!
     
  15. Hmm, that is really a hard question. I had my heart set on the 200 micro until I discovered that there was a 70-180. I researched both lenses and made my decision based upon cost. As you know I was able to acquire the 70-180 from KEH for about $915 in used condition. But, as everyone mentioned, KEH underrates their lenses. It was actually in pristine condition! I think I will stick with the 70-180 due to the flexible zoom, but either lens would be great. I can tell you this, it produces beautiful, saturated images. Hope that helps and doesn't confuse much. :wink:
     
  16. Flew

    Flew

    994
    Jan 25, 2005
    Alabama
    Crystall,

    It does help, tremendously. Not confusing at all. :lol:

    If I had to buy right now, I'm not sure which way I'd go. The flexibility of the zoom and constant aperture of the 70-180 is awfully tempting though. 8)
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Lily Macro, Flowers, Insects, and Greenery Jul 1, 2017
Star Lilies Macro, Flowers, Insects, and Greenery Jun 1, 2017
Water Lilies Macro, Flowers, Insects, and Greenery Sep 27, 2016
Tiger Lily Macro, Flowers, Insects, and Greenery Jun 16, 2016
Ever feel like you are being followed? Macro, Flowers, Insects, and Greenery Oct 20, 2013