Looking for 17-50ish DX lens

Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
300
Location
San Francisco, CA
I sold my 17-55mm lens to fund a D700 purchase, but now I'm looking for a cheaper alternative for my backup D90 since I love the versatility of the 17-55 range and f2.8 aperture. I'm looking at either the Tamron 17-50 or Sigma 18-50. Any advice on which is better or more likely to approximate the Nikon 17-55 without the size/weight/cost?

Paul
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
2,483
Location
Missouri
Get the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 HSM. It is a toss up between which of the two is sharper.....though I still think the Tamron is sharper. Photozone.de made a comment in their review of the tamron that it has one of the highest resolution's they have ever tested from a lens (i.e. sharpness) and is even very sharp wide open which most lenses can't do.

However, the Sigma HSM version is supposed to be just as good (some argue better). The Tamron has some compatability issues with some D90's. Myself and a few other people that I found searching google....have issues with the autofocus quitting sporadically and requiring you to dismount/remount the lens to get it back. This is a near impossible issue to fix as well since it only happens with this lens and a D90 combo...so there's no way to figure out which is at fault for warranty service.

If you were shooting anything besides a D90 I'd say to get the Tamron....since you are shooting a D90, I'd say get the Sigma.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
976
Location
chicago
Have you considered the Nikon 16-85mm VR? It's half the price of the 17-55, is a great lens in its own right, has VR, is a perfect match for the D90, and best of all, its a Nikon.
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
2,483
Location
Missouri
Have you considered the Nikon 16-85mm VR? It's half the price of the 17-55, is a great lens in its own right, has VR, is a perfect match for the D90, and best of all, its a Nikon.
While it does gain VR and a little bit of range, that lens is nowhere near as sharp as the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 (or Sigma). Still an option, but there's much better out there in that range for less money and better IQ in my opinion.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
882
Location
St. Louis
Real Name
Mike
While it does gain VR and a little bit of range, that lens is nowhere near as sharp as the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 (or Sigma). Still an option, but there's much better out there in that range for less money and better IQ in my opinion.
I've never heard or read of anyone claiming the Tamron is that much sharper than the 16-85. Can you elaborate?
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
2,483
Location
Missouri
I've never heard or read of anyone claiming the Tamron is that much sharper than the 16-85. Can you elaborate?
Yeah, my mistake...I was thinking of a different lens. They are actually pretty equal in sharpness. I'd still prefer the Tamron due to the smaller DOF of f2.8 while still retaining it's sharpness, but the 16-85 would make a good walk around lens...especially outdoors.
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
2,483
Location
Missouri
I preferred the Sigma over the Tamron, and I had both.
somehow prefered its rendering.
Good to hear....I've been seriously considering selling my Tamron and picking up a used Sigma HSM version due to the compatability issues I've been having. However, I got a stupidly sharp copy of the Tamron and am scared to make that switch and end up with a lesser sharp copy of the Sigma.

I also really love the tones and colors I get with the Tamron...haven't tried the Sigma to compare though.
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
2,447
Location
South Orange, NJ
I have the sigma 18-50 and i use it for all of my event shoots alongside my 70-200. Its as sharp as my 35 1.8 and 70-200 and focuses just as quickly. I have owned that lens for over a year, if it wasnt sharp enough I would have sold it a long time ago.

+1 for the sigma
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
34
Location
UK
Any sample pics? I'm thinking about something to replace my 18-200VR which I'm just not happy with most of the time.
The siggy 18-50 sounds interesting, but would leave a slight hole before the 70-300 - would that be a problem?
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2008
Messages
715
Location
Wild, Wonderful, West Virginia
The Tamron has some compatability issues with some D90's. Myself and a few other people that I found searching google....have issues with the autofocus quitting sporadically and requiring you to dismount/remount the lens to get it back. This is a near impossible issue to fix as well since it only happens with this lens and a D90 combo...so there's no way to figure out which is at fault for warranty service.
This is not only an issue with the 17-55, my Tamron 28-75 does this too.

It does it on both of my bodies.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
6,530
Location
Rockville, MD
There's also the Tokina 16-50, although I think it's as heavy as the Nikon 17-55 is. Between the Sigma and Tamron I think it's a wash. The Tamron is better/worse in some areas and the Sigma is too. Same with Tokina. Want it all at once you've got to buy the Nikon.

Personally I'd go edward's route. Just use your existing 18-70dx lens and then add a 35/1.8 to your kit, or throw your 50/1.8 in your pocket if you might need something faster than the kit lens.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
The siggy 18-50 sounds interesting, but would leave a slight hole before the 70-300 - would that be a problem?
Not if you don't mind walking 2 steps forward or 2 steps backwards. The small gap will just make it clear which lens you should choose for any particular subject.
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
2,447
Location
South Orange, NJ
Sigma 18-50 2.8 HSM EX

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
2,483
Location
Missouri
This is not only an issue with the 17-55, my Tamron 28-75 does this too.

It does it on both of my bodies.
Wait....so your 28-75 does the same as my 17-50....and it does it on both your D70s and D40? If that's the case, I'm gonna start bugging Tamron and try and send it in for warranty since I've only had it 6 months...wonder how their customer service is....
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom