1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Macro lens.

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by cwilt, May 10, 2005.

  1. cwilt


    Apr 24, 2005
    Denver, CO
    I currently have the Nikor 60mm micro but am looking for something with a longer reach. It comes down to the nikor 105 and the sigma 150. Any comparisons between these lenses and how will they compare to the 60mm?

    I would like to have the 200mm Nikor but that is a bit out of range for a macro lens for me.
  2. I use the 105mm and like it. It does give you more reach and yet is a sharp lens.
  3. MontyDog


    Jan 30, 2005
    #1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax;
  4. cwilt


    Apr 24, 2005
    Denver, CO

    From everything I have read the 200mm f4 is almost legendary nikon optics. Why would you recomend the 70-180 over the 200? Why a zoom macro? I put my zoom lenses on the shelf and now use all primes.
  5. nfoto

    nfoto Guest

    Paul's answer is sensible. The 70-180 Micro-Nikkor isn't your average zoom lens, a far cry from that in fact. It has superb optics, is very well corrected for the close-up range, and while its flatness of field isn't entirely up to the perfection of other Micro-Nikkors, you need the latter as a reference to realise that the 70-180 isn't perfect in this regard. A unique feature of the 70-180 is that it doesn't lose light when you focus closer. All other lenses, including the fixed-focal length Micros do that. So, while max. speed f/5.6 may not sound too impressive at 180 mm, it still is f/5.6 at 1:1 (with 6T added to the master lens). The f/2.8 Micros typically dwindle to f/5-5.3 at 1:1, the 200/4 non-AF Micro is approx. f/6.7, and the 200AF f/4 is around f/5.3.

    The other benefit of the 70-180 is that framing your subject is very convenient, far more so than moving the tripod as you have to do with the other lenses.
  6. dan_m

    dan_m Guest

    105 is a great lens

    Of all of the Nikon lenses I've owned 20, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, 24-120, 24-120VR, 17-35 2.8, 80-400VR, etc, etc., the 105 macro is the best. Great portrait and macro lens.

    Dan M.
  7. Your post on the 70-180 is so timely. I was planning on purchasing a 200mm micro after I sell my 60mm micro and Tamron 180 macro. I noticed that B&H Photo carries the grey market version of the 70-180. Why did Nikon discontinue the 70-180mm? It seems like the perfect cross between zoom and micro? I am watching one on e-Bay, but it seems as though I would do just as well at BH.

  8. ckdamascus


    May 14, 2005
    New Jersey
    I too covet the legendary 70-180mm Micro Nikkor! I wonder if it ever was released in the US? Maybe they figured the US market got sick of flower pictures or that most US consumers would not realize that F/4.5-5.6 is not that slower given that close up focusing drops aperatures on the other macro lens anyway and the 70-180mm is designed to resist that.

    For now, I think I am going to go for a cheap 70-300mm f/4-5.6 ED combination with some 5T or 6T close up "lens". I am curious what the image compromise will be but certainly a cheaper entry for me into macro vs the macro lens for now.
  9. Tosh


    May 6, 2005
  10. Tom_Kline


    Apr 24, 2005
    One can only hope that a VR-AFS version of the 70-180 is in the works :idea: ; it would be a real winner!!!
  11. kjoosten


    May 1, 2005
    Houston, TX
    Got one - looks pretty darn good

    I just got one of the B&H 70-180 grays and am putting it through its paces. Like Glenn, I wanted to see how it worked as a regular tele-zoom. I did some comparisons agains some of the best PRIME Nikkors, and was pretty impressed with the results. For those who can stand a quick visit to the dark side, the test shots are here:


    Thom Hogan also found this lens interesing, and it made it into one of his "reduced content" bags.

    "70-180mm Micro. A very flexible lens that works quite well for outdoor macro work. I like it better than the 200mm because it's easier to frame quickly (plus it substitutes for the 70-200mm for general use). Fast AF and maximum aperture aren't big issues for macro work. Note that the 70-180mm only goes to 1:2, so you absolutely need the 5T and 6T."
  12. Gale


    Jan 26, 2005
    Viera Fl
    Might think of putting on my 70-300 a 5T and 6T. Or thoughts on the B + W

    Hummmm any thoughts on that.
  13. Chris101


    Feb 2, 2005
    B+W lenses are singlets Gale, and work best on lenses shorter than 135mm. On my 24-120vr they are a dream, but on my 180 f/2.8 they look like a lens baby until f/11 or smaller.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.