1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Need lens recommendation

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by atoronto, Jul 18, 2008.

  1. atoronto

    atoronto

    180
    Jun 16, 2008
    Toronto
    I currently have the Nikon 24-70, 70-200 VR and 105 2.5 AIS, planning:

    A. Sell the 70-200 VR and get the 85mm 1.4 and 70-300 VR
    B. Keep the 70-200 VR and get the 85mm 1.8

    I mostly shoot family photos and portrait, please your kindly give me some recommendations. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. mood

    mood

    Jun 27, 2007
    So Fla
    I did exactly A

    sold my 70-200, got the 85 1.4 and 70-300

    regrets?

    the 70-300 is no 70-200 , thats for sure
     
  3. I'd go with A. Or look for a used 80-200 AF-S (about $900) instead of the 70-300.
     
  4. atoronto

    atoronto

    180
    Jun 16, 2008
    Toronto
    Thanks for your kindly reply, if I get the 85 1.4 I only have money left for the 70-300, or maybe get the Sigma 50-150 2.8, what you guys think, because sometimes I need the 2.8 zoom to shoot the school play for my daughter.
     
  5. atoronto

    atoronto

    180
    Jun 16, 2008
    Toronto
    Frank do you miss the 70-200 after you sold it? just curious:smile:
     
  6. 70-200 is a different class to the 70-300

    The 70-300 is a great lens but far from the quality of the 70-200. Which is reflected in the price.

    To answer this question, would you sell your 24-70 2.8 and buy the 18-70 3.5-4.5?
     
  7. mood

    mood

    Jun 27, 2007
    So Fla
    Alex

    I wouldn't say I miss it exactly, it is a big lens to casually walk around with

    the 70-300 strengh is its smaller size and much smaller price tag, but do not expect the same results as the 70-200

    I am hoping the 85 1.4 gets more use in the future as I move more towards portrait/ people shots
     
  8. B. Keep that 70-200, and the 85 1.8 is a fine photo maker. Not as robust made as the 1.4, no A-M switch and a tad slower, but still a very fine lens.
     
  9. gvg45

    gvg45

    314
    Jun 16, 2008
    Los Angeles, Ca.
    I think the question should be is the 85 1.4 that much better than the 85 1.8 that warrants replacing your 70-200 for a 70-300?

    I have never used the 85 1.4. Some of the pictures posted by owners of this lens are simply stunning. I just picked up a 85 f/1.8 and its a superb lens, especially considering the price.
     
  10. atoronto

    atoronto

    180
    Jun 16, 2008
    Toronto
    That's the reason made me think about the 85 1.4, oh well what a NAS.:wink:
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.