New Nikon 14-24 today

Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
2,547
Location
Denmark
Bought it again - received it today.

2784246356_3cde3d8d60.png
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


View attachment 241461


Bought it for my D200 in February, but there was - for me unexpected at that time - to much flare/ghosting, so I send it back.

Later I have learned (BJørn Rørslett), that there can be a hidden disadvantage using FX-lenses on DX-cameras.


But whatever .......I have to work around it.

Was SO much in doubt:

Should it be:

The 14-24,
The 17-35,
The Zeiss 35 f/2.0 or
The Zeiss 18 f/3.5


....for my 6 days old Nikon D700 (sold my beloved Tokina 11-16, because I also sold my D200 and 18-200 to raise the money).


But some pics from the 14-24 on FX, also with the sun in the image, gave me the last push.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
4,553
Congrats Steinar, you got the best of the best.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
1,243
Location
London UK
That really is one large front element! Look forward to seeing some photos from it!
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
2,547
Location
Denmark
Thank you Peter, Jahn and all.

No I do not have a link, but I can search my pc for his lines, it was a discussion I raised and discussed with him because I was so disapointed about all the flare/ghosting X) -


10 minutes and I will be back with it - I think.


X
I shot with the 14-24 on D200 some hours (lended/borrowed the lens), and it was so fantastic, and I thought there were no flaws, but the weather was overcast, so I did not pay attention to that issue, and when I got it and the sun was shining it was another story - also got 3 ghosts with only some lamps.

But the sharpness .... amazing, so I ordered it again for my new FX, and hope it is less on FX, but even not - I want this sharpness.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
2,547
Location
Denmark
Bjørn Rørslett:

There is a hidden disadvantage using FX/135mm format lenses on a DX camera. These lenses may record a "cropped" image, but their angle of view isn't altered so they "see" and transmit light from a much larger area than you observe in the viewfinder. Hence they exacerbate the proneness to flare and ghosting for two reasons (a) the extra light captured isn't image-forming so can only add to the general level of flare, and (b) point lights outside the recorded area might make nasty contributions to ghosting and flare. Remember the "recorded" area seen in the image is smaller than what the lens itself captures. The "cropping" doesn't occur in front of the lens and many people tend to overlook this trivial fact.
 
P

Paul.r.lindqvist

Guest
Well im afraid that the flare/ghosting wont be gone on FX (not from my experience anyway)

Its impossible with that portruding front element, regardless the lens is amazing and is a blast.

Congrats on the re-acquisition.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
2,547
Location
Denmark
Thank you Vladik - I certainly will, jmacd.
 

Latest threads

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Forum GIFs powered by GIPHY: https://giphy.com/
Copyright © Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom