Nicole and Michael

Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
I shot backup for Kurt (Kemnik) last Friday. Here's a few samples from the wedding. I hope Kurt adds some of his shots.

1
603329659_uqLfu-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


2
603331613_e77Lm-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


3
603332998_M7iLt-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


4
603456041_sNmrV-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


5
603334358_xXVGa-XL-2.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


6
603336453_9h6AL-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


7
603456016_4EcVw-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


8
603336779_YmfeS-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


9
603337674_KETxH-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


10
603337825_R6Xqp-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


11
603337630_d7vfY-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
19
Location
Omaha
The editing seems tortured on many of the color images, too processed looking. The B&W is nice.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
I like #1. Would love to see it in color.

I didn't upload a color version of that picture, Dennis, but here's a companion shot taken moments after and under the same conditions.

603329688_F43tH-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
19
Location
Omaha
That's interesting, Bob. Does that apply to all of the color images or just to Grandma?

Hi Frank.

I was probably a little harsh but #5 & 6 look a little overprocessed is all. Are you using a D200 per chance? These look much like some results I get from a Fuji S5which is based on the D200.

Cheers!
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
Hi Frank.

I was probably a little harsh but #5 & 6 look a little overprocessed is all. Are you using a D200 per chance? These look much like some results I get from a Fuji S5which is based on the D200.

Cheers!

Not to worry, Bob, you're entitled to your opinion, and I appreciate the feedback. The light was pretty harsh for #5, and I had to use the recovery tool to tame the bride's gown. That may account for your impression. With regard to #6, there was no heroic processing... just RAW conversion in LR2.3, using the D2X-2 profile, and cropping. I surprised you didn't jump on #7. I punched up grandma's picture with Topaz Adjust.

I shot the wedding with a d700.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
1,700
Location
BC
Real Name
Paul
I didn't upload a color version of that picture, Dennis, but here's a companion shot taken moments after and under the same conditions.

603329688_F43tH-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

#1 is cute but, for some reason, looks posed. This one looks very spontaneous. I like it better.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Forum GIFs powered by GIPHY: https://giphy.com/
Copyright © Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom