Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4D for Studio Work?

Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
6
Location
Fort Worth TX
Being a newbie to Nikon, I would like your opinions on the Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4D for studio type work. Is it sharp? How well does it work with the D300? Is there a better alternative for studio work considering cost to return ratio.

VR
Darryl
 
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
2,025
I have always been intriugued by this lens but never gotten around to it. I actually once ordered it from B&H only to call them a short while later to cancel.

Like some, it seems my lens lust is waning. No point in having lenses that sit on shelves gathering dust.

Hopefully some with experience of this lens will give you the info you need.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,475
Location
Live in Ohio but from NJ
Almost any lens will suffice for studio work. You will be shooting f8-f11. If a lens isn't sharp at those apertures it's basically defective. I personally prefer that focal length range for my studio shooting since I like tight shots and spend most of my time in the 50mm+ range.

BTW, I don't own the 24-85 (I owned a similar model in 1994, although it's been a while and could have been a 28-85 - fuzzy memory).
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2006
Messages
6,664
Location
On a Big Island Down Under...
I agree with Joe about the sharpness of a lens at f/8-11...

But I do have the 24-85G f/3.5-4.5 and this is a really sharp lens wide open especially at the longer FL....
Thom Hogans and Bjørn Rørslett give the "G" lens a good wright up if f/2.8 isn't that important too you...

For me, this lens is a keeper and maybe one day I'll get a FF camera to get the most out of it... ;o))
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
724
Location
Staten Island, NY
I expect this lens to gain popularity since the D700 announcement.
I sold mine because I got better range with DX lenses on my D300, but it may be time to get another in anticipation of going FF.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
4,971
Location
Huntington Station, NY
The 24-85mm f/2.8-4 is an excellent lens and would work very nicely for studio work and portraiture. I used the lens for a while and liked it very much. Images were sharp, color was great, bokeh was pleasing at f/4.

I don't think you would be disappointed using this lens for studio work.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
1,628
Location
RV on the road
I agree with Joe about the sharpness of a lens at f/8-11...

But I do have the 24-85G f/3.5-4.5 and this is a really sharp lens wide open especially at the longer FL....
Thom Hogans and Bjørn Rørslett give the "G" lens a good wright up if f/2.8 isn't that important too you...

For me, this lens is a keeper and maybe one day I'll get a FF camera to get the most out of it... ;o))
Do hang onto it Wally - the 3.5-4.5 G version works very nicely on a D3 - it, and a 70-300VR, are my D3 "light kit" (if that's possible :eek:)
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2006
Messages
6,664
Location
On a Big Island Down Under...
Do hang onto it Wally - the 3.5-4.5 G version works very nicely on a D3 - it, and a 70-300VR, are my D3 "light kit" (if that's possible :eek:)
Hey Ron, I hear you on this... No way I'd get rid of any lens that works as well as this one, the 24-85G f/3.5-4.5 is a real winner...
BTW, my light weight kit even on DX format is the 24-85G f/3.5-4.5 and the small, light weight superb Nikon 28-200G f/3.5-5.6....:smile:
Surprised that the Nikon 28-200G f/3.5-5.6 isn't being used more often by the FX crowd...
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom