Nikon 105 F2.5 AIS vs. Sigma 105 2.8 Macro

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by smodak, Jun 21, 2007.

  1. smodak


    Jun 11, 2007
    Franklin MA US
    I have the sigma. How does it compare to the AIS Nikon? The AIS is said to be clasic portrait lens. Would it perform better for portraits than the Sigma Macro?

    How is the manual focussing on a D1H/D2H or a D200 without a new focussing screen?

    I am thinking of buying a the AIS for outdoor portraits..but worried about focussing...(I am used to AF).
  2. smodak


    Jun 11, 2007
    Franklin MA US
    Also how does the AIS compare to the 105 DC?

    The price difference is a lot...
  3. Focusing isn't a big deal with portraits because your subject isn't moving around very much and there is that focus verification dot in the viewfinder.
  4. The 105/2.5 is a good lens, but you don't really need it if you already have a sharp 105mm. Your Sigma should fare just fine for portraiture.
  5. smodak


    Jun 11, 2007
    Franklin MA US

    Since I already have the Sigma 105, may be the 135 DC?

    Pure LLD.
Similar Threads Forum Date
Samples from Nikon 28 F2 AI ? Lens Lust May 15, 2009
Help deciding between Nikon 28mm f2.8 AIS or Nikon 35mm f2 AF? (Updated) Lens Lust Apr 23, 2009
Nikon 135 f2 Ais first time out. Lens Lust Nov 30, 2008
Voigtlander 40mm/f2 Ultron for Nikon AIS Lens Lust Apr 14, 2006
Nikon 135mm F2 Ai/Ais ??? Lens Lust May 31, 2005