Nikon 200-400 VR or Sigma 300-800

Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
58
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hi All,

I am wanting a longer lens to replace my 50-500sigma and am curious which of these 2 you think is better and why.

Obviously the sigma has way more reach.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
2,868
Location
Sudbury, Massachusetts
I don't have mush experience with either, but I will suggest that you go lift both before you buy. I know the 200-400 was 7.2 lbs, but until I tried one on a D2H, I didn't really appreciate the true size of this rig.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
58
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Of course the hard thing is to find a place that actually has one in stock that u can try. Most have to order it and are reluctant unless i can commit 90% to buy, which i am not at yet.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
994
Location
Alabama
Daniel,

Several Cafe members have the 200-400VR, and I have shot with them and seen their images. It is a great lens, and very carry-able. I think that the 300-800 is probably a good lens, but isn't really targeted toward the same applications as the 200-400.

Guess it depends on what you will be using it for.

Frank
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
58
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hi Frank

I want to use it for sports - skating and hockey indoors and soccer and baseball outdoors. Also some birding.

I have the TC14E2 and 17

I am wondering iof the f4 aperture is a hinderance when compared to maybe a 400 F2.8?
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
994
Location
Alabama
Daniel,

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the 400 2.8 will be superior in almost every way to the other lenses that you have listed. It is also about $7,000. If I could possibly afford one, I'd get it in a minute. :lol:

For inside sports shooting, I would definitely agree that a 2.8 or faster lens is highly desirable. To me, that would include the 85 f1.4, 85 f1.8, 70-200VR f2.8, 300 f2.8, and the 400 f2.8.

Regards,

Frank
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
58
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
yeah i hear you frank.

The tough part of this decision is that a 400 2.8 is prob sharpewr and better max apeture. However, the 200-400 has VR so helps a bit with low light but of course not with high speed action, it also has a large zoom range where the 400 is fixed.

Tough call.

I think i need to find a place that can let me touch both, or maybe i'll try to find a place to rent them.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
994
Location
Alabama
Daniel,

I forgot one or two things, including the 200 f2. You should also consider the 300 f2.8 VR.

Frank
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
1,643
Location
Central, FL USA
two competely different lenses...

I currently have both... sold the 200-400... bought a 70-200.....
hated it compared to the 200-400... returned the 70-200 and
bought for the second time the 200-400... oh well...

they are both incredibly sharp and fast focusing lenses..
the Sigma is great if you plan on not moving around much.. the reach is remarkable and is tack sharp wide open from 300-700... at 800 at f8 it is tack sharp... side by side test it's sharper than the 200-400 with a tc...

The 200-400 is mobile...great on a monopod and even with the 1.4 tc it's very sharp ...

so it really depends what you are going to use the lens for...
I shoot MX with both lenses and it works out great... oh... bokeh
on the 300-800 is really nice...

my favorite of the two is the Sigma 300-800 for it's reach...

hope this was a little help...
 
B

bpetterson

Guest
I have the
200-400 f4 VR
400mm f2.8
200mmVR f2

All are great and expensive.
Each has it's best usage.
So you need to pick your most usage and that is it.

For field sports- long field- the 200-400mm with monopod.

Static subects 400mm f2.8 with monopod or sturdy tripod

Sports in rather poor lighting and where you are close
You can't beat the 200mm f2 VR

I was using the 200-400mm yesterday with the D2X in HSC
whats that FOV of 800mm @ f4 tack sharp. I was on Gitzo 1325 tripod and Kimberley Head
Even tried the mirror lock up.

The 200mm f2 is the easiest to carry around.

Birger
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom