Nikon 35mm

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by Removed User 3, Jun 8, 2007.

  1. Now that I am back to normal today.....

    Whats the opinion on the Nikon 35mm f 2.0 ?

    Why better than 50mm ?

    Expect this to stir up a few.

    I knew that lens lusting disease would return so I am not cured yet.
     
  2. I like 35mm better because for indoors, 50mm was too close for my taste.
    I also like the closer focusing distance on the 35mm.
     
  3. Thanks Jimmy. I didnt like the 50mm for that reason too. Prefer to use the 17/55 f 2.8 as dont have 35mm.
     
  4. That 17-55 sure is a beauty. I'd probably use it quite often as well if I had it but I don't.
    The 35mm is so small and light, it makes for a very nice lens to have on the camera just walking around. There are times I would love to have extra reach but then, I just move my lazy rear closer :tongue:
     
  5. SP77

    SP77

    Jun 4, 2007
    Rockville, MD
    I love my 35/2. For indoor shooting, 50mm is just too long. The 35/2 is 1/4th the weight, size, and price of the 17-55 f/2.8 and it also handles way better obviously. I also like the close focusing on the 35/2. I posted some samples here.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 15, 2017
  6. I just sold my 50mm F1.4. For film it is fine but I am now using the 35mm F2 with the 20mm F2.8 and the 85mm F1.8 mostly on digital now.
    The 35 and 85 lens combination is great on digital for the way that I shoot weddings and can be used on film too.
     
  7. Thanks guys for your honest answers.
     
  8. The way I look at it is the 35 is really equivalent to the old "standard" 50 when you take into account the 1.5 crop factor. Similarly the 50mm is really a 75mm, which traditionally is an odd focal length. Of course it all comes down to person usage. I use the 35 for miscellaneous shooting in low light (and close focus shots) and I like the focal length, but for the life of me I just can't find a reason to buy the 50mm - which is too bad because they represent fantastic value.
     
  9. SP77

    SP77

    Jun 4, 2007
    Rockville, MD
    I'm keeping my 50 around for when my 2 month old starts crawling/walking/toddling around, and for outdoor stuff or portrait type work. In those cases the little bit of extra reach will come in handy. If it doesn't get much use or the focal length still isn't quite right after that then I'll just let it go. The main reason I got it was just to play with it and see if I'd like a large aperture lens. I do! :biggrin: Great little lens for $100. :smile:
     
  10. mikebass1

    mikebass1

    20
    Jun 3, 2007
    California
    I was considering the 50mm f1.4 or f1.8. Between feedback I got on my question and yours I think I'm leaning to the 35mm f2.
     
  11. and I'm just leaning Mike.
     
  12. patrickh41

    patrickh41 Guest

    Tried the 45? It's grossly over-priced but a beatiful gem of a lens and can rival anything the 35 does. If you done mind manual operation the 28/2.8 AIS is a lovely competitor too.
     

  13. Edward,
    I knew you would chip in on this one at some stage. Having tried the 50mm my eye has been turned to the 35mm. The jury is still out. For the moment.
    :biggrin:
     
  14. Don't forget the 35/f1.4 AIS... stunningly sharp in the mid-apertures and very fast. Yields a dreamy kind of image at f/1.4, too.

    DSC_0210-plink.
     
  15. gugs

    gugs

    490
    Feb 24, 2006
    Belgium
    I love the 35mmf2AIS, very sharp, light and compact. I also have a 35f1.4AIS, but that version is prone to terrible CA fully open. Interesting as a low light lens, but forget it if there are high contrast areas... I also tested a 35f2AF (non-D version) and it was also prone to CA @f2, but not as bad as the 1.4.

    Here is a shot with the 35f2AIS:
    239308200_f1172d46ac_b.
     
  16. SP77

    SP77

    Jun 4, 2007
    Rockville, MD
    my 35/f2D can also get some pretty bad CA wide open at f/2 in high contrast scenes, like a city street with utility lamps at night. It's mostly gone by f/2.8
     
  17. I have been looking for a 35 f/2 (D or AI-S) recently and they are fairly hard to find, especially used. After getting some feedback for what I want to shoot (indoor concerts) I think my bag for that will consist of the 50 f/1.8 and 35 if I can get it before June 22nd :)
     
  18. Better go and check out this 35mm then .......
     
  19. Guest-002

    Guest-002 Guest

    263
    Jan 14, 2006
    Worcester, MA
    I just got a 28-70 f/2.8 that is incredibly sharp wide open. I like the idea of an extra stop but I'm wondering if the 35 f/2 is as sharp at f/2 or does it need to be stopped down, in which case I really don't get that one stop advantage. Of course, it'a a lot smaller and lighter. That 28-70 really deserves its "Beast" designation.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Why no Nikon 35mm 1.4G images page? Lens Lust Feb 7, 2016
Comparison: Nikon 35mm f/1.8 ED G vs 35mm f/2 AF-D Lens Lust Mar 12, 2015
Nikon 35mm f1.8 ED or Sigma 35mm f1.4 Lens Lust Jan 3, 2015
35mm lens decision sigma or nikon Lens Lust Oct 16, 2014
Nikon 35mm f1.8 G ED (FX) Lens Lust Sep 24, 2014